A Dead Iranian Scientist and Israel’s “No Comment” Policy

January 15, 2012 15:14 by

A reader I’ll call A. in Australia wants to know about Israel and Mostafa Rashan, a Natanz uranium enrichment supervisor assassinated last week. She writes:

Yesterday, we had reports that a scientist in Iran was killed by the Mossad . . . Israel hasn’t answered the media’s queries. What have you to say about this?

While the US denied any involvement, Israel has a “no comment” policy, which means the government will never confirm or deny a connection to any covert activity around the world.

You can make the case that this info vacuum allows Israel’s name to be dragged through the mud, or you can argue that the swirl of mystery is good for the Mossad’s reputation — irrespective of whether it actually had a hand in the hit.

Either way, the no comment policy is what it is.

So absent Jerusalem’s confirmation or denial, we’re left with rumors, speculation, commentary, and anonymous sources making unverifiable cryptic comments more likely to serve their interests than the public’s. There’s a lot of all that in the papers now, and none of it qualifies as news. Talk is cheap.

It’s certainly possible Israel had a role in the attack, and it’s a legitimate point for discussion. Other countries besides Israel have an interest in undermining Iran’s nuclear program. And I’ve even heard rumors that Iran kills their own scientists if they fall out of favor.

But in the end, all we really know is that a scientist was killed by a car bomb and the regime is furious. Everything else  is just speculation.

Category: Backspin Tags:, , , , ,
2 Comments

You may also like:

  1. Cleaning Up Comment is Free
  2. “Just A Tool For Iranian Interests”
  3. Recognizing the Iranian Threat
  4. France bans Iranian TV
  5. Iranian Foothold in West Bank

2 Comments → “A Dead Iranian Scientist and Israel’s “No Comment” Policy”

  1. Richard Lehrman

    11:37 am

    Jan 16, 2012

    Typical Isreali overreaction! So the guy was working on something to kill some Jews, maybe a million or so. Instead, Israel could have penned a strongly worded letter of protest to the Mullahs, or even the New York Times (“dear Mullahs, we know you are feverishly seeking nuclear power solely for peaceful purposes, but be aware that if you launch a nuclear missile strike against Tel Aviv, you will leave us no choice but to lodge a strongly worded complaint to the UN”)

    Well-loved. Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

    Reply
  2. [...] HonestReporting Media BackSpin, 15. Januar 2012 [...]

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
Show poorly rated comments

Leave a Reply

More in Backspin (177 of 5882 articles)
NoBrainer


Everything you need to know about today's media coverage of Israel and the Mideast. Finger-pointing over the death of a ...

View in: Mobile | Standard