AFP publishes an article celebrating the wives of convicted Palestinian terrorists to mark International Women’s Day.
Palestinians have been killed while carrying out terrorism or confronting Israeli security forces. So why then does The Guardian refer to Israeli self-defense as “deadly retaliation?”
Even after SodaStream moved out of the West Bank, and even after 600 Palestinians lost their jobs, the BDS movement is still finding excuses to boycott and demonize Israel.
Two Israeli soldiers got lost using Waze, and then were attacked by armed Palestinians….but you wouldn’t know it from the headlines.
In The Guardian, author David Rieff argues that “Israel offers a florid illustration of how disastrously collective memory can deform a society.”
The Guardian refers to right-wing Israeli group Im Tirtzu as “extra-paramilitary.” Was this subconscious bias at work?
The Guardian’s sub-header states as fact, an allegation that a Palestinian woman was raped and tortured by the Israeli military after carrying out a terrorist bombing in 1969.
The Toronto Star posts a video by “comedian” Scott Vrooman promoting BDS through anti-Israel lies and libels.
Pretty weak of The Independent to recycle a 2013 commentary by Matt Hill on whether Israel’s an apartheid state. An editor’s note at the bottom of the commentary acknowledges this, without explaining why. I’ll get to my theory in a moment. It’s Israel Apartheid Week in the UK, and Hill’s dusted-off argument is that the apartheid…
The Huffington Post becomes a platform for encouraging its readers to adopt the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israeli goods.