Two Palestinian stabbing attacks on Israeli women are described as “exchanges of violence” in the New York Times’ headline.
The brutal stabbing of Israeli mother Dafna Meir, in her home in Otniel, fails to generate much media coverage. Just how bloodthirsty does a Palestinian terror attack against Israelis have to be to deserve coverage?
Why does CNN think it’s appropriate to include a politicized Palestinian museum in its feature on cultural attractions opening in 2016?
The International Business Times inaccurately states that Hamas took over Gaza through democratic means and states the Hamas capture of an Israeli spy dolphin as fact.
The Independent wrongly states that the Green Line, agreed in the 1949 armistice, was the line “between Israel and Palestine.”
The New York Times bends over backwards to avoid using the term “terrorism.” They do make one exception however.
A Guardian opinion piece implies that Israeli Jews are spreading racist hatred having failed to learn the lessons of Nazism and Mein Kampf.
The hatred of Israel by the people interviewed should have been included so it would be clear their liberal views end in terms of peace with Israel.
Why would a journalist leave out 90% of what a source said? Maybe she wanted readers to have a certain impression that might not reflect the reality?
Following a Hezbollah attack, some media fail to include the context behind Israel’s control over the Shebaa Farms region on the Lebanese border.