I liked the Rav story, thanks. It would be great if the truth held such sway today. Let’s just keep at it, plugging away and maybe truth will become fashionable again someday. g.
And I do not want to see his posts deleted- let him rant- To those who are less bias it shows the kind of mindset that the Israelis have to put up with.
That is cruel. You don’t tell a drug addict to go ahead and take more and more drugs till you kill yourself.
This “mine” guy is an addict, a junky. He gets his highs from the responses his filthy letters generate. With each response he probably, drooling profusely, goosesteps around his little padded room and heils his swastika flag and his treasured pictures of Adolph und Goebbels und Goering und Himmler and the rest of his heros. He may even get so excited that he soils his diaper – several times.
I don’t know if he can be rehabilitated. If worse comes to worse being unable to raise anyone’s ire may cause him to be so frustrated that he becomes suicidal. A sure cure.
Steve, as for the rants that the Israelis must put up with, Jews all over the world still hear them. Thanks to the platforms given “mine” and his sick, motley crew of neo-Nazis and Koranic “Submitters” those rants are growing ever more numerous and loud.
Give them no platforms from which to be heard. It will save the world a lot of grief.
If everyone who has and is tempted to respond to herr mine’s version of the facts I say Sha, Shtill. DO NOT RESPOND. He will soon vanish.
And the saddest part is, “Mine” doesn’t even know he’s insane! I agree that it is important that whoever comes to this post sees the kind of sick hatred that we have to put up with–some people have no idea. They should be given the opportunity for a “balanced” exposure to the reality Jews live with — and if you think it’s just a lone demented person – check out sites like “jew watch” and youtube–you’ll realize that this insane with hate person “mine” has others–lots of them–who “think” in nothing but violent and hateful terms.
I would like to recieve Honest Reporting Daily News Stream at my e-mail address. I was receiving, but not any longer. Kyra “Annie” Parker Nelson, anniekapn@gmail.com
No amount of media manipulation will alter the fact that Zionism results in rank discrimination and eventually persecution of non-Jews. It’s clear that the majority of Jews are rejecting Zionist principles. How many Jews have you heard about lately who are “making Aliyah” i.e. emigrating to Israel? Instead, large numbers of Israelis are constantly leaving Israel for other countries, even Germany (!). The time is coming when this social experiment, Zionism, will find up on the same trash heap with the other social experiments of the 20th Century (Socialism, Communism, etc.)
Zionism asks only that the Jews have their own state. Had it not been for Zionism there would be no Israel and Jews would forever be subject to more holocausts.
Zionism does not as you falsely state lead to discrimination against non Jews. But non Jews and, indeed, Jews who deny Jews their own state and wish to annihilate that state can not and should not be treated with kid gloves.
I would like to know where you get your statistics about the numbers of Jews immigrating to and emigrating from Israel. If there are such stats they probably come from the same sources as your other anti Israel misinformation. Those sources that you prefer to believe and there are many are the real manipulators of information. As are people like you.
Zionists asking that Jews have thier own state is perfectly reasonable, it’s how that was done and the aftermath that has created the problem.
It’s not perfectly reasonable that Zionism should ask that Jews have their own state if that means that millions of non-Jews should have their lives destroyed for generations. Do you agree?
“It’s not perfectly reasonable that Zionism should ask that Jews have their own state if that means that millions of non-Jews should have their lives destroyed for generations. Do you agree?”
NO.
Millions of non Jews were not displaced as you imply. The pseudo Palestinians for the most part left at the behest of their leaders, hoping to return in days to grab what the supposed-to-be dead Jews left. The PP’s are the only refugees in history that, thanks to the UN and their brother Arabs, can pass their refugee status to their descendants.
Approximately 700,000 Arabs became refugees. Approximately 850,000 Jews from Arab lands became refugees.
They are the only refugees in history that have not been able to integrate within a single generation with the populations of the countries to which they fled.
The Jews have all been settled and integrated, mostly in Israel but also in some other countries. The PP’s cause such disruption and turmoil that they are unwelcome wherever they go. Their Arab brethren want them kept as refugees so that their willing tools like J.B. can use them against Israel.
But it’s extraordinary that you don’t agree. You’re saying then, I think, that the creation of a Jewish state would be reasonable even if that meant uprooting millions of non-Jews?
We’re not yet at the point of discussing whether or not any of that actually happened, merely the theoretical point of whether such a scenario is reasonable. You’re saying that you think it is, I’m saying that I think it isn’t.
The Balfour declaration said “…..it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Do you think that’s reasonable, I do.
The Balfour declaration said “…..it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Do you think that’s reasonable, I do.”"” That is perfectly correct- And considering the existence of the 1.5 million Israeli Muslims (Out of a population of 7 million)
Across the board -In the Judiciary, the Knesset, the universities, the military, in medicine, sports and the arts.
With positions of judges, MP`s, Mayors, lecturers, generals and majors.
In fact it was a Muslim judge that tried and sentenced Katsav the Israeli ex- president for rape!
I think the Israelis have honoured that- dont you!
Agree or Disagree: 20
steve mann
3:27 pm
Apr 25, 2012
We sure have been here before- so here is the same answer as before- 56 Islamic states- of which 12million Indians were displaced to invent it- Should that go back to the Hindu`s? 49 Roman Catholic- 20 Protestant 12 Eastern Orthodox 4 Hindu.
Zionism is not the point. The point is hate directed towards Jews. I am 85 years of age and have the experience of knowing what I am writing about. WW2 was a grand experience in that respect. I never witnessed more hate than that period. But, proudly, I did not let hate consume me. For the second time I enlisted in another war: The Korean War
“But it’s extraordinary that you don’t agree. You’re saying then, I think, that the creation of a Jewish state would be reasonable even if that meant uprooting millions of non-Jews?”
NO. That is what YOU are saying.
You have invented a hypothetical case that can never happen. WHY have you done this?
“The Balfour declaration said “…..it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Do you think that’s reasonable, I do.” Yes I think it is reasonable assuming that the Arabs do nothing to prejudice their own and the Jews’ civil and religious rights. They have, however, done that from well before the founding of the state of Israel and continue increasingly today.
Because there was no reply button next to it, for some unknown reason, that’s happened before now.
There is barely a country that failed to come about without someone being “Inconvenienced”
That may be true, although I can’t immediately think of any others in modern history that parallels what’s happened here over many years now.
So I ask you again- Pakistan was created out of India- 12 million Indians displaced- 1 million died in the process- Is that similar to your analogy?
I cannot think why that’s relevant, but I’m happy to answer. No, it’s not similar, the power that created the mess – Britain – didn’t stay in permanent military occupation of a subjugated people, as has happened in Palestine, in flagrant violation of many UN resolutions.
Should Pakistan not be an Islamic state?
Pakistan can be whatever sort of state it likes.
Should all the Hindus rejected from West and East Pakistan as it was- be returned?
Yes, If they want to return. I have no idea what the situation is in that regard. Similarly, Muslims who fled to what became Pakistan should be allowed to return to India if they want to, perhaps they are so allowed, I don’t know.
You mean its not relevant because it fails your agenda-
However read your answer again- and think-
Why were there no UN resolutions re- India under British rule? There were no UN resolutions against Britain when Palestine was under its mandate was there? And what resolutions has Israel not adhered to that hold international laws- certainly not 242! And what about the 1st UN resolution 181 to whit the Arabs refused to accept.?
It would appear that you expect more from Israel than you do from her adversaries-
And this is the problem with you thesis- “Fri. 29 Jul. 2011 @ 13.06 –
Hamas foreign minister reiterates Hamas’ rejection of two-state solution and commitment to gaining ‘Palestine in its entirety’ by force.
Hamas’ foreign minister, Mahmoud Al-Zahar, recently conducted a television interview in which he once more set out Hamas’ rejection of Israel’s right to exist. He argued that ‘Palestine in its entirety is Islamic waqf land, which cannot be relinquished’:
‘At this moment in time, we say to you, first of all: We want Palestine in its entirety – so there will not be any misunderstandings. If our generation is unable to achieve this, the next one will, and we are raising our children on this. Palestine means Palestine in its entirety, and Israel cannot exist in our midst.’
Al-Zahar also declared that Hamas would view any Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, or a compromise agreement with the Palestinian Authority, as only a ‘first stage’ towards the destruction of Israel in its entirety. He asserted that this was the key difference between Hamas and their secular rivals, Fatah.” When you can Israel how to resolve this- then I will listen to your views- Until then I suggest you visit the pro Hamas web sites and persuade them to change their attitude.
Why were there no UN resolutions re- India under British rule? I don’t know. There were no UN resolutions against Britain when Palestine was under its mandate was there? I don’t know.
It would appear that you expect more from Israel than you do from her adversaries, because it’s Israel that’s got the guns, and refuses to implement many UN resolutions and flouts the Geneva Convention.
As you say, certainly not 242. Nor many others that you’ll be familiar with.
John you must really read the actual convention- Not just listen to what you have been told.
“No. The relevant clause, Article 49, prohibits the “occupying power” from transferring population into the “occupied territory.” Aside from the fact that the territory is not occupied, but disputed, Morris Abrams, the U.S. Ambassador to the UN in Geneva, had pointed out that the clause refers to the forcible transfer of large populations. By contrast, the settlements involve the voluntary movement of civilians. The U.S. Department of State, accordingly, does not view Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention as applicable to settlement activity in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. For that reason, the official U.S. position has been over the years that settlements are legal, even though successive administrations have criticized them on political grounds. (Only the Carter administration for a short time held that settlements were illegal; this position was overturned by the Reagan administration.) “
I don’t believe that the Palestinians have moved voluntarily. The territory is occupied by Israelis, they should not be there. The territory is not disputed, even if it were, which it is not, why would anyone think that Israel had any rights over it. I’m not interested in the US position, I’m interested in what the world, through the UN, says, and, as you said, resolution 242, and many other resolutions, say the Israelis should not be there.
Oh dear! I can see that whatever I say you will never accept- However-
Lets exclude the American take- Here -Resolution 242 para 1- calls for respect of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognised borders. There is absolutely no call in the resolution for a return to the armistice demarcation lines.
So now to basics- who were Palestinians? for there are no such people now- The people you seemed to be talking about are the refugees who were left after the 48/50 war- for it was not only Muslims who were given the name Palestinian- There were Hebrews, Christians and others pre 47.
And who created these refugees- Jordan and Egypt. What part are they being asked to play in the statehood of these people- None- Why? Only Israel is being asked to give, give, give. and she has.
Israel land mass under 8000 square kilometers- Jordan land mass 34500 square kilometers Egypt land mass 387000 square kilometers.
I know you keep saying it was their land- Well it was not. However Israel has now relinquished the Gaza to these refugees- And has recognized the Palestinian Authority with Abbas as its leader-
Its time for Jordan to surrender part of the East Bank to assist in facilitating a new state- So that Israel can have defensible borders- For as sure as there are little green apples- When this new state comes about Hamas will surely take it over- as in Gaza- and Israel will have yet more rockets fired on her.
Well, never say never, and we do agree on the Balfour Declaration, but you’re probably right that I’m unlikely to accept much of what you say.
Resolution 242 says, as you well know, “Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”. You do know that, do you?
We both perfectly well know the people we’re talking about – the people living in what is now Israel in the few years after WW2. I agree with you that these people included Muslims, Jews and Christians. Let’s call them “Palestinians” as a nice simple, short term, shall we.
Now here’s a difficult one – you say that Jordan and Egypt created these refugees. Really? The refugees fled in fear of attack by Jordanians and Egyptians? Really?
What have land areas got to do with anything?
Where did I say it was their land? Whose land did I say it was?
It’s time for Jordan to surrender part of the East Bank? Really? Who says so? Why is it time?
And yes, Israel is likely to continue to have rockets fired at it until it implements the many and various UN resolutions, conforms to its international treaties, returns stolen land, etc etc, you know the rest.
242 is absolutely clear- It says “Withdrawal from TERRITORIES” And simultaneously the ceasing of hostilities against Israel- Both Arafat in his time and certainly Hamas have sworn that hostilities will never cease until Israel is demolished.
These other areas are surely key to a settlement- More and more and from within Jordan there is talk of the West Bank refugees being part of Jordan.
“Jordanians, for decades, were avid proponents of the ‘Jordan is Palestine’ position. They used that position as justification for the annexation of the West Bank, arguing that Palestine was one single, indivisible unit, and that Jordan was the legitimate governing body of Palestine…
‘We are the government of Palestine, the army of Palestine and the refugees of Palestine.’ Prime Minister of Jordan, Hazza’ al-Majali, 23 August 1959
‘Palestine and Transjordan are one.’ King Abdullah, Arab League meeting in Cairo, 12 April 1948
‘Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine; there is one people and one land, with one history and one and the same fate.’ Prince Hassan, brother of King Hussein, addressing the Jordanian National Assembly, 2 February 1970
‘Jordan is not just another Arab state with regard to Palestine, but rather, Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan in terms of territory, national identity, sufferings, hopes and aspirations.’ Jordanian Minister of Agriculture, 24 September 1980
‘The truth is that Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.’ King Hussein 1981″
FOR YOUR BRAIN TRUST AND SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING STAFF: Here’s an idea for turning up the heat on news media when a story is inaccurate or biased: You can add useful information to your webpage automatically. Every subscriber will be provided lists of names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. that he/she can click on. For a subscriber, sending an email or finding a phone number will be as easy as pie. Your effectiveness will be multiplied greatly.
In what follows, I’ve enumerated the simple steps you can use to implement this. It’s not the only way to get it done easily.
When sending out a call to your subscribers, i.e., to encourage them to write letters, etc., you would ordinarily generate a message about a given dishonest news item and post it on your website. You would be asking them to write to their congressman, their editor, a journalist, a local TV or radio station, etc. The problem is that 95% or more of your subscribers will read your webpage and think that is a good thing to do, but will do NOTHING, because of the difficulty of finding the names, addresses, email addresses or phone numbers of their congressman, editor, etc…. and because they just don’t simply “have the time right now”
Here’s how to MULTIPLY your effectiveness by attaching a unique “response page” to the above webpage:
1. Prepare a master address book in which each item is the name, address, zip code, phone number and email address of a publisher, a correspondent, a politician, an organization. Try to make it inclusive of all such persons or organizations, in any particular order. These are people and organizations that ought to be alerted to the false stories honest reporting uncovers.
2. Update the list from month to month. It could turn out to be a file of several thousand entries. Note: These two tasks are easy. May require 0.10 FTE per year to staff it.
3. Have your programmer write a program that will automatically create a random sample of, say, 50 names drawn from the complete file, plus up to 10 names drawn from that file that are in a designated State or Zip code area.
4. Give this program the capacity to implement the following actions: 1) check your present list of subscribers, choose the first subscriber, identify that subscriber’s State and/or Zip code; 2) draw a random sample described in 3. above; 50 names from the master list. 3) from that sample, generate three lists to be attached to your webpage a. name and address b. name and email address c. name and phone number 4. Also from the master list, draw a random sample of 10 names with the constraint that they contain the State or Zipcode of the subscriber, and do not duplicate the 50 names already selected. Add them to 3a, 3b and 3c. or display them as three more lists. 5. Repeat these steps for each subscriber. Implement steps 1-5 above in order to produce randomly selected lists tailored to each subscriber’s location. In short, the process will tailor your webpage to your subscriber’s location, giving the subscriber up to six lists to choose. If the subscriber elects to write a letter, the name and address list (3a) can be used for easy merge-mailing. If he or she elects to send email, list 3b can be used. If he or she elects to phone, list 3c is right in front of one’s nose.
Features: 1. A subscriber has the capability of choosing any number of persons or organizations to contact, up to the 60 contacts provided. It is as easy to write to all 60 as to write to just one. 2. A subscriber can decide whether to use letter, email or phone, or all three. 3. Because of the randomization process, recipients of mail will receive different mail from different subscribers at different times; i.e., there will be greater diversity of response and greater amounts of local (constituent) interest, as well as greatly increased volume of mail or phone calls.
Paul J. Hoffman 1120 Royal Lane San Carlos, CA 94070
I have been arguing Israels case on the You Tube video of Finklestien on BBC Hardtalk. This is the response from its uploader: and I have now been blocked!
@mombser2 – Please stop abusing the comments section with your understanding of history. the audience is quite capable of making their own mind about what is happening in the middle east and we’ve had enough of your rants. I dislike removing comments but you’re pushing your luck sir.! so please,? enough!
what abuse I gave I do not know- My history taken from well known articles of Joan Peters- Nonni Darwish- Waleed Shoebatt- and HR information- Who said freedom of speech was dead- ME.
1967- Egypt, Jordan and Syria plan to-gether to attack-Egypt`s Abdul Nassar masses his troops at the Israeli/Sinia border and orders the UN observers OUT.
1971- Egypt attacks across the Suez canal.
Suicide bombers from Islamic Jihadi groups within Gaza and the West Bank attack civilians in Bus Stations , cafe`s and on buses.
Sharon gives Gaza to the PA- pulls out every Jew and Israeli- And then rockets are fired on a daily basis.
That in my book is 60% on defense- As has been said -
If the Arabs were to get rid of their weapons there would be peace- If Israel were to- There would be no more Israel.
However it is only in recent years that these have had to “PopUp2 To counter the “LIES the Mis Information” that people like you (And you come over as a Jihadi Islamist- Dar ul-Harb Dar ul-Islam) Have been spreading for years.
This guy “mine” amuses me. One voice he praises the Brit soldiers and rightly so, for assisting the liberation of Europe and hence the ending of the concentration camps- To which over 60,000 Jewish soldiers lost their lives in the operation of:
Then blames the Jews for having a land that the British Minister Balfour promised to them. When the time came for that to happen- The British government RENEGED on its promise- and chickened out. This of course after in 1920 80% of the land promised was given to the Hashemite tribe from the Sahara Desert- now known as Jordan- This we hear very little about- no one ever says- Hashems go back to Saudi where you come from- this land is Palestinian!-do they?
The Hashemites were from the Sahara Desert- Abdullah their leader assisted Lawernce in fighting the Turks to oust them from Palestine- After the success and Britain ruled the area- Lawrence persuaded Wimston Churchill to give the Eastern side of the River Jordan to Abdullah and his people- nothing to do with the French- The French “Pinched ” the area now known as Syria- The place where their leader has killed 10000 of his own people, nice guy. So your history lesson to me was “Crap”- And keep it up I just find you so amusing in your obvious childish hate- There are those who want to ignore you- I dont- I just laugh at your infantile rants- “Just found an Israeli demonstrator, so I smashed his face in with a rifle.” Doesn`t that just show others how your mind works- You probably have never held a rifle in your life- And you would probably mess your pants if you ever had to look down the barrel of one!
Cant wait for your next rant- As Nothing funnier on the TV.
Though I am a bit disappointed that you have not thought up a better line than the last one.
I think you need someone to feed you some better sound bites- Try an editor from the Di Sturmur. No! that’s to complicated for you to understand- The Beano Comic might be more to your mentality-
Hey how about knocking on Mossely`s coffin- I know consult Amerdinijad or Assad -
I await the next installment. with bated breath. Thank you for the entertainment.
Iranian-Islamic Justice To MINE HR 2012–04–18 By Avi Dear MINE The following report is taken from “IRAN Human Rights” site, whose address is http://www.iranhr.net/spip.php?article2440 The whole site, and this report, might be of interest to those twisted minds like your-self. You are even invited to move and live in Iran to witness (and most probably enjoy) these Islamic-Iranian daily “Actions”. Then you can complain about Jews, why do not they satisfy you like your dearest friend in Iran!? But be careful there, because you might very well be one of them… “2011: The highest number of annual executions in the past 11 years Sources: Amnesty International (AI) and Iran Human Rights (IHR): • 2000: 165 (AI) • 2001: 75 (AI) • 2002: 316 (AI) • 2003: 154 (AI) • 2004: 108 (AI) • 2005: 94 (AI) • 2006: 177 (AI) • 2007: 317 (AI) • 2008: 350 (IHR), (346; AI) • 2009: 402 (IHR), (388; AI) • 2010: 546 (IHR) (adjusted to 646)* • 2011: 676 (IHR) : Official: 416 non-official: 260 * 100 of the 140 executions in the province of South Khorasan (Birjand) that were confirmed by the Iranian officials have been added to the 2010 numbers” Of course, this is nothing as compared with Syrian Asad who has killed so far about 9,000 men, women, old, and young and children of many Syrian Tribes. You seem to be very proud of your dear friends…
To MINE, HR APRIL 23 2012 By Avi Documentary of Moslem brutal attack on Graves of Australian Defenders
Dear MINE and all those who think like you
You will probably enjoy every second of the following documentary evidence. You probably count it as a celebration when the Moslems destroy the Australian War Memorial Toombs and break the Christian and Jewish Memorial Stones of those who have sacrificed their lives to Protect Humanity from the Sadists of the last century.
You criticize Jews and Israel as much as you can. What would you do if some Jews would do what some of Moslems do?
As you can see in the documentary, not one Moslem, not a pack of them’ but a cult of them act so brutally against the dead, against other’s symbols, believes, culture, and heritage. And YOU dear mindless MINE, not only have no word of criticism, but most possibly enjoy and even support their primitivity and brutality!!!
Offence on graves of death, is a starting point of offence against humans.
There is a saying: “where books are burned, humans will be burned”
I say: “Where the graves are attacked, humans will be attacked as well”
I also say: “Where the symbols and signs of a culture are attacked, eventually also humans will be attacked”
So stop the “symbolic” attack before it is too late! NO tolerance and no forgiveness for verbal mines of mindless “MINES”.
Micky- Thats what the Jews in Germany did- They ignored Hitler- thinking he would “go away”
We dont lay down anymore- We slag these vermin off in any way possible- He/she irks me not- I amuse at its pathetic nonsense- and it shows others who use this site, those who are neither for or against- just what the Jews and Israelis have to challenge.
Actually Micky- I have been looking over this “Things” posts. I have and I think justifiably, come to the conclusion that it is a British Muslim of Pakistan descent.
These guys are cowards and thats why “It” tends to portray itself as a disgruntled ant-Semite. of a fascist background. And “It” will not be very old-
Its an interesting hypothesis- And “Its” words and attitude fit the M.O.
Gabi
6:38 pm
Mar 26, 2012
I liked the Rav story, thanks. It would be great if the truth held such sway today. Let’s just keep at it, plugging away and maybe truth will become fashionable again someday.
g.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
1
gabi
6:16 pm
Apr 02, 2012
Dear “mine”,
I can’t imagine how many incarnations it will take for you to correct the hatred you carry and spew into the world. May G-d help you.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
5 
1
Jules
10:21 pm
Apr 02, 2012
I remember the British and their military men as evil monsters when it came to aiding the Jews. The British are, after all, the Nazi’s cousins.
Jules
Agree or Disagree:
3 
1
Mickey Oberman
6:18 am
Apr 03, 2012
MODERATOR
Why is this piece of garbage permitted to vomit his filth on this site?
What does his vile input do to advance the discussion?
This is not freedom of speech.
This is a perpetuation of Naziism.
Please cleanse this thread of his hatemongering garbage.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
1
steve mann
11:55 am
Apr 03, 2012
And I do not want to see his posts deleted- let him rant-
To those who are less bias it shows the kind of mindset that the Israelis have to put up with.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
Mickey Oberman
3:38 pm
Apr 03, 2012
Steve,
That is cruel. You don’t tell a drug addict to go ahead and take more and more drugs till you kill yourself.
This “mine” guy is an addict, a junky. He gets his highs from the responses his filthy letters generate.
With each response he probably, drooling profusely, goosesteps around his little padded room and heils his swastika flag and his treasured pictures of Adolph und Goebbels und Goering und Himmler and the rest of his heros. He may even get so excited that he soils his diaper – several times.
I don’t know if he can be rehabilitated. If worse comes to worse being unable to raise anyone’s ire may cause him to be so frustrated that he
becomes suicidal. A sure cure.
Steve, as for the rants that the Israelis must put up with, Jews all over the world still hear them. Thanks to the platforms given “mine” and his sick, motley crew of neo-Nazis and Koranic “Submitters” those rants are growing ever more numerous and loud.
Give them no platforms from which to be heard. It will save the world a lot of grief.
If everyone who has and is tempted to respond to herr mine’s version of the facts I say Sha, Shtill. DO NOT RESPOND. He will soon vanish.
D O N O T R E S P O N D D O N O T R E S P O N D
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
steve mann
6:11 pm
Apr 15, 2012
So, Micky,
I told him to write more and I`ve waited- He has gone away-
Its like a child tell it to do something and it wont- Tell it not to and it will!
Worth thinking about!
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Mickey Oberman
6:54 pm
Apr 15, 2012
steve,
I have been known to be right on rare occasions.
Do you suppose it was the “diaper” part that struck home?
Beware. He may appear with a different disguise. Possibly an over sized nose.
Mickey
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Gabi
4:09 pm
Apr 03, 2012
And the saddest part is, “Mine” doesn’t even know he’s insane! I agree that it is important that whoever comes to this post sees the kind of sick hatred that we have to put up with–some people have no idea. They should be given the opportunity for a “balanced” exposure to the reality Jews live with — and if you think it’s just a lone demented person – check out sites like “jew watch” and youtube–you’ll realize that this insane with hate person “mine” has others–lots of them–who “think” in nothing but violent and hateful terms.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
Mickey Oberman
9:38 pm
Apr 03, 2012
DO NOT RESPOND
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Kyra Ann Parker Nelson
7:05 pm
Apr 12, 2012
I would like to recieve Honest Reporting Daily News Stream at my e-mail address. I was receiving, but not any longer. Kyra “Annie” Parker Nelson, anniekapn@gmail.com
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
steve mann
11:47 am
Apr 16, 2012
Mickey-
He would need a brain to be that clever!
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
Ed
2:36 pm
Apr 24, 2012
Palestinian sentenced to death for selling his home to Israelis:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/palestinian-sentenced-death-selling-home-jews_640592.html
Obviously, the story has been overlooked by mainstream media.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Harry Lax
2:36 am
Apr 25, 2012
No amount of media manipulation will alter the fact that Zionism results in rank discrimination and eventually persecution of non-Jews. It’s clear that the majority of Jews are rejecting Zionist principles. How many Jews have you heard about lately who are “making Aliyah” i.e. emigrating to Israel? Instead, large numbers of Israelis are constantly leaving Israel for other countries, even Germany (!). The time is coming when this social experiment, Zionism, will find up on the same trash heap with the other social experiments of the 20th Century (Socialism, Communism, etc.)
Agree or Disagree:
1 
5
steve mann
10:34 am
Apr 25, 2012
So “Harry” In that case explain the existence of the 1.5 million Israeli Muslims (Out of a population of 7 million)
Across the board -In the Judiciary, the Knesset, the universities, the military, in medicine, sports and the arts.
With positions of judges, MP`s, Mayors, lecturers, generals and majors.
In fact it was a Muslim judge that tried and sentenced Katsav the Israeli ex- president for rape!
SO HARRY BOY EXPLAIN!!!!!!!!
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Mickey Oberman
4:50 am
Apr 25, 2012
Zionism asks only that the Jews have their own state. Had it not been for Zionism there would be no Israel and Jews would forever be subject to more holocausts.
Zionism does not as you falsely state lead to discrimination against non Jews. But non Jews and, indeed, Jews who deny Jews their own state and wish to annihilate that state can not and should not be treated with kid gloves.
I would like to know where you get your statistics about the numbers of Jews immigrating to and emigrating from Israel. If there are such stats they probably come from the same sources as your other anti Israel misinformation. Those sources that you prefer to believe and there are many are the real manipulators of information. As are people like you.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
John Bradford
11:14 am
Apr 25, 2012
We’ve been here before….
Zionists asking that Jews have thier own state is perfectly reasonable, it’s how that was done and the aftermath that has created the problem.
It’s not perfectly reasonable that Zionism should ask that Jews have their own state if that means that millions of non-Jews should have their lives destroyed for generations. Do you agree?
Agree or Disagree:
1 
2
Mickey Oberman
1:09 pm
Apr 25, 2012
“It’s not perfectly reasonable that Zionism should ask that Jews have their own state if that means that millions of non-Jews should have their lives destroyed for generations. Do you agree?”
NO.
Millions of non Jews were not displaced as you imply. The pseudo Palestinians for the most part left at the behest of their leaders, hoping to return in days to grab what the supposed-to-be dead Jews left.
The PP’s are the only refugees in history that, thanks to the UN and their brother Arabs, can pass their refugee status to their descendants.
Approximately 700,000 Arabs became refugees. Approximately 850,000 Jews from Arab lands became refugees.
They are the only refugees in history that have not been able to integrate within a single generation with the populations of the countries to which they fled.
The Jews have all been settled and integrated, mostly in Israel but also in some other countries.
The PP’s cause such disruption and turmoil that they are unwelcome wherever they go. Their Arab brethren want them kept as refugees so that their willing tools like J.B. can use them against Israel.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
John Bradford
1:25 pm
Apr 25, 2012
But it’s extraordinary that you don’t agree. You’re saying then, I think, that the creation of a Jewish state would be reasonable even if that meant uprooting millions of non-Jews?
We’re not yet at the point of discussing whether or not any of that actually happened, merely the theoretical point of whether such a scenario is reasonable. You’re saying that you think it is, I’m saying that I think it isn’t.
The Balfour declaration said “…..it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Do you think that’s reasonable, I do.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
3:30 pm
Apr 25, 2012
The Balfour declaration said “…..it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Do you think that’s reasonable, I do.”"” That is perfectly correct- And considering the existence of the 1.5 million Israeli Muslims (Out of a population of 7 million)
Across the board -In the Judiciary, the Knesset, the universities, the military, in medicine, sports and the arts.
With positions of judges, MP`s, Mayors, lecturers, generals and majors.
In fact it was a Muslim judge that tried and sentenced Katsav the Israeli ex- president for rape!
I think the Israelis have honoured that- dont you!
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
steve mann
3:27 pm
Apr 25, 2012
We sure have been here before- so here is the same answer as before-
56 Islamic states- of which 12million Indians were displaced to invent it- Should that go back to the Hindu`s?
49 Roman Catholic-
20 Protestant
12 Eastern Orthodox
4 Hindu.
You object to ONE Jewish state!
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
steve mann
3:28 pm
Apr 25, 2012
56 Islamic states- of which 12million Indians were displaced to invent Pakistan- Should that go back to the Hindu`s?
Correction to other post.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
John Bradford
3:35 pm
Apr 25, 2012
I don’t believe that I’ve said I object to a Jewish state. I can’t imagine why I would, because I don’t.
Let me rephrase the question – “is it reasonable to create a state for a group of people when that causes distress to others?”
I think the answer to that question, which in essence is the one I posed, must surely be no, mustn’t it?
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
3:39 pm
Apr 25, 2012
There is barely a country that failed to come about without someone being “Inconvenienced”
So I ask you again-
Pakistan was created out of India- 12 million Indians displaced- 1 million died in the process-
Is that similar to your analogy?
Should Pakistan not be an Islamic state?
Should all the Hindus rejected from West and East Pakistan as it was- be returned?
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Jules Tabak
12:07 pm
Apr 25, 2012
Zionism is not the point. The point is hate directed towards Jews. I am 85 years of age and have the experience of knowing what I am writing about. WW2 was a grand experience in that respect. I never witnessed more hate than that period. But, proudly, I did not let hate consume me. For the second time I enlisted in another war: The Korean War
Jules
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Mickey Oberman
2:43 pm
Apr 25, 2012
John Bradford,
“But it’s extraordinary that you don’t agree. You’re saying then, I think, that the creation of a Jewish state would be reasonable even if that meant uprooting millions of non-Jews?”
NO. That is what YOU are saying.
You have invented a hypothetical case that can never happen.
WHY have you done this?
“The Balfour declaration said “…..it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine….” Do you think that’s reasonable, I do.”
Yes I think it is reasonable assuming that the Arabs do nothing to prejudice their own and the Jews’ civil and religious rights. They have, however, done that from well before the founding of the state of Israel and continue increasingly today.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
John Bradford
3:38 pm
Apr 25, 2012
You’re not saying that it is reasonable and you’re not saying that it isn’t?
But at least you agree with me that the Balfour declaration is reasonable, that’s a start.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
3:46 pm
Apr 25, 2012
John when are you going to answer my question-?
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
John Bradford
4:03 pm
Apr 25, 2012
Because there was no reply button next to it, for some unknown reason, that’s happened before now.
There is barely a country that failed to come about without someone being “Inconvenienced”
That may be true, although I can’t immediately think of any others in modern history that parallels what’s happened here over many years now.
So I ask you again-
Pakistan was created out of India- 12 million Indians displaced- 1 million died in the process-
Is that similar to your analogy?
I cannot think why that’s relevant, but I’m happy to answer. No, it’s not similar, the power that created the mess – Britain – didn’t stay in permanent military occupation of a subjugated people, as has happened in Palestine, in flagrant violation of many UN resolutions.
Should Pakistan not be an Islamic state?
Pakistan can be whatever sort of state it likes.
Should all the Hindus rejected from West and East Pakistan as it was- be returned?
Yes, If they want to return. I have no idea what the situation is in that regard. Similarly, Muslims who fled to what became Pakistan should be allowed to return to India if they want to, perhaps they are so allowed, I don’t know.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
4:34 pm
Apr 25, 2012
You mean its not relevant because it fails your agenda-
However read your answer again- and think-
Why were there no UN resolutions re- India under British rule?
There were no UN resolutions against Britain when Palestine was under its mandate was there?
And what resolutions has Israel not adhered to that hold international laws- certainly not 242!
And what about the 1st UN resolution 181 to whit the Arabs refused to accept.?
It would appear that you expect more from Israel than you do from her adversaries-
And this is the problem with you thesis-
“Fri. 29 Jul. 2011 @ 13.06 –
Hamas foreign minister reiterates Hamas’ rejection of two-state solution and commitment to gaining ‘Palestine in its entirety’ by force.
Hamas’ foreign minister, Mahmoud Al-Zahar, recently conducted a television interview in which he once more set out Hamas’ rejection of Israel’s right to exist. He argued that ‘Palestine in its entirety is Islamic waqf land, which cannot be relinquished’:
‘At this moment in time, we say to you, first of all: We want Palestine in its entirety – so there will not be any misunderstandings. If our generation is unable to achieve this, the next one will, and we are raising our children on this. Palestine means Palestine in its entirety, and Israel cannot exist in our midst.’
Al-Zahar also declared that Hamas would view any Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, or a compromise agreement with the Palestinian Authority, as only a ‘first stage’ towards the destruction of Israel in its entirety. He asserted that this was the key difference between Hamas and their secular rivals, Fatah.”
When you can Israel how to resolve this- then I will listen to your views- Until then I suggest you visit the pro Hamas web sites and persuade them to change their attitude.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
John Bradford
4:52 pm
Apr 25, 2012
No, I don’t mean that.
Why were there no UN resolutions re- India under British rule? I don’t know.
There were no UN resolutions against Britain when Palestine was under its mandate was there? I don’t know.
It would appear that you expect more from Israel than you do from her adversaries, because it’s Israel that’s got the guns, and refuses to implement many UN resolutions and flouts the Geneva Convention.
As you say, certainly not 242. Nor many others that you’ll be familiar with.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
11:26 pm
Apr 25, 2012
John you must really read the actual convention- Not just listen to what you have been told.
“No. The relevant clause, Article 49, prohibits the “occupying power” from transferring population into the “occupied territory.” Aside from the fact that the territory is not occupied, but disputed, Morris Abrams, the U.S. Ambassador to the UN in Geneva, had pointed out that the clause refers to the forcible transfer of large populations. By contrast, the settlements involve the voluntary movement of civilians. The U.S. Department of State, accordingly, does not view Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention as applicable to settlement activity in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. For that reason, the official U.S. position has been over the years that settlements are legal, even though successive administrations have criticized them on political grounds. (Only the Carter administration for a short time held that settlements were illegal; this position was overturned by the Reagan administration.) “
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
John Bradford
12:07 am
Apr 26, 2012
I don’t believe that the Palestinians have moved voluntarily. The territory is occupied by Israelis, they should not be there. The territory is not disputed, even if it were, which it is not, why would anyone think that Israel had any rights over it.
I’m not interested in the US position, I’m interested in what the world, through the UN, says, and, as you said, resolution 242, and many other resolutions, say the Israelis should not be there.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
11:20 am
Apr 26, 2012
Oh dear! I can see that whatever I say you will never accept- However-
Lets exclude the American take- Here -Resolution 242 para 1- calls for respect of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognised borders.
There is absolutely no call in the resolution for a return to the armistice demarcation lines.
So now to basics- who were Palestinians? for there are no such people now- The people you seemed to be talking about are the refugees who were left after the 48/50 war- for it was not only Muslims who were given the name Palestinian- There were Hebrews, Christians and others pre 47.
And who created these refugees- Jordan and Egypt. What part are they being asked to play in the statehood of these people- None- Why? Only Israel is being asked to give, give, give. and she has.
Israel land mass under 8000 square kilometers-
Jordan land mass 34500 square kilometers
Egypt land mass 387000 square kilometers.
I know you keep saying it was their land- Well it was not.
However Israel has now relinquished the Gaza to these refugees-
And has recognized the Palestinian Authority with Abbas as its leader-
Its time for Jordan to surrender part of the East Bank to assist in facilitating a new state- So that Israel can have defensible borders- For as sure as there are little green apples- When this new state comes about Hamas will surely take it over- as in Gaza- and Israel will have yet more rockets fired on her.
If , now after 67 years
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
John Bradford
12:23 pm
Apr 26, 2012
Well, never say never, and we do agree on the Balfour Declaration, but you’re probably right that I’m unlikely to accept much of what you say.
Resolution 242 says, as you well know, “Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”. You do know that, do you?
We both perfectly well know the people we’re talking about – the people living in what is now Israel in the few years after WW2. I agree with you that these people included Muslims, Jews and Christians. Let’s call them “Palestinians” as a nice simple, short term, shall we.
Now here’s a difficult one – you say that Jordan and Egypt created these refugees. Really? The refugees fled in fear of attack by Jordanians and Egyptians? Really?
What have land areas got to do with anything?
Where did I say it was their land? Whose land did I say it was?
It’s time for Jordan to surrender part of the East Bank? Really? Who says so? Why is it time?
And yes, Israel is likely to continue to have rockets fired at it until it implements the many and various UN resolutions, conforms to its international treaties, returns stolen land, etc etc, you know the rest.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
steve mann
1:19 pm
Apr 26, 2012
242 is absolutely clear-
It says “Withdrawal from TERRITORIES”
And simultaneously the ceasing of hostilities against Israel- Both Arafat in his time and certainly Hamas have sworn that hostilities will never cease until Israel is demolished.
These other areas are surely key to a settlement- More and more and from within Jordan there is talk of the West Bank refugees being part of Jordan.
“Jordanians, for decades, were avid proponents of the ‘Jordan is Palestine’ position. They used that position as justification for the annexation of the West Bank, arguing that Palestine was one single, indivisible unit, and that Jordan was the legitimate governing body of Palestine…
‘We are the government of Palestine, the army of Palestine and the refugees of Palestine.’ Prime Minister of Jordan, Hazza’ al-Majali, 23 August 1959
‘Palestine and Transjordan are one.’ King Abdullah, Arab League meeting in Cairo, 12 April 1948
‘Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine; there is one people and one land, with one history and one and the same fate.’ Prince Hassan, brother of King Hussein, addressing the Jordanian National Assembly, 2 February 1970
‘Jordan is not just another Arab state with regard to Palestine, but rather, Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan in terms of territory, national identity, sufferings, hopes and aspirations.’ Jordanian Minister of Agriculture, 24 September 1980
‘The truth is that Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.’ King Hussein 1981″
Since then whats changed!
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Paul Hoffman
11:14 am
May 03, 2012
FOR YOUR BRAIN TRUST AND SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING STAFF:
Here’s an idea for turning up the heat on news media when a story is inaccurate or biased: You can add useful information to your webpage automatically. Every subscriber will be provided lists of names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. that he/she can click on. For a subscriber, sending an email or finding a phone number will be as easy as pie. Your effectiveness will be multiplied greatly.
In what follows, I’ve enumerated the simple steps you can use to implement this. It’s not the only way to get it done easily.
When sending out a call to your subscribers, i.e., to encourage them to write letters, etc., you would ordinarily generate a message about a given dishonest news item and post it on your website. You would be asking them to write to their congressman, their editor, a journalist, a local TV or radio station, etc. The problem is that 95% or more of your subscribers will read your webpage and think that is a good thing to do, but will do NOTHING, because of the difficulty of finding the names, addresses, email addresses or phone numbers of their congressman, editor, etc…. and because they just don’t simply “have the time right now”
Here’s how to MULTIPLY your effectiveness by attaching a unique “response page” to the above webpage:
1. Prepare a master address book in which each item is the name, address, zip code, phone number and email address of a publisher, a correspondent, a politician, an organization. Try to make it inclusive of all such persons or organizations, in any particular order. These are people and organizations that ought to be alerted to the false stories honest reporting uncovers.
2. Update the list from month to month. It could turn out to be a file of several thousand entries.
Note: These two tasks are easy. May require 0.10 FTE per year to staff it.
3. Have your programmer write a program that will automatically create a random sample of, say, 50 names drawn from the complete file, plus up to 10 names drawn from that file that are in a designated State or Zip code area.
4. Give this program the capacity to implement the following actions:
1) check your present list of subscribers, choose the first subscriber, identify that subscriber’s State and/or Zip code;
2) draw a random sample described in 3. above; 50 names from the master list.
3) from that sample, generate three lists to be attached to your webpage
a. name and address
b. name and email address
c. name and phone number
4. Also from the master list, draw a random sample of 10 names with the constraint that they contain the State or Zipcode of the subscriber, and do not duplicate the 50 names already selected. Add them to 3a, 3b and 3c. or display them as three more lists.
5. Repeat these steps for each subscriber. Implement steps 1-5 above in order to produce randomly selected lists tailored to each subscriber’s location.
In short, the process will tailor your webpage to your subscriber’s location, giving the subscriber up to six lists to choose. If the subscriber elects to write a letter, the name and address list (3a) can be used for easy merge-mailing. If he or she elects to send email, list 3b can be used. If he or she elects to phone, list 3c is right in front of one’s nose.
Features:
1. A subscriber has the capability of choosing any number of persons or organizations to contact, up to the 60 contacts provided. It is as easy to write to all 60 as to write to just one.
2. A subscriber can decide whether to use letter, email or phone, or all three.
3. Because of the randomization process, recipients of mail will receive different mail from different subscribers at different times; i.e., there will be greater diversity of response and greater amounts of local (constituent) interest, as well as greatly increased volume of mail or phone calls.
Paul J. Hoffman
1120 Royal Lane
San Carlos, CA 94070
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
steve mann
6:38 pm
May 14, 2012
“Uploaders’ Comments (krimane )
I have been arguing Israels case on the You Tube video of Finklestien on BBC Hardtalk. This is the response from its uploader: and I have now been blocked!
@mombser2 – Please stop abusing the comments section with your understanding of history. the audience is quite capable of making their own mind about what is happening in the middle east and we’ve had enough of your rants. I dislike removing comments but you’re pushing your luck sir.! so please,? enough!
what abuse I gave I do not know- My history taken from well known articles of Joan Peters- Nonni Darwish- Waleed Shoebatt- and HR information-
Who said freedom of speech was dead- ME.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Jimi
12:34 pm
Mar 24, 2012
“No Israel = No apartheid practicing, rascist, supremicist, ignorent [...]”
IgnorEnt indeed.
What a dunce!
Agree or Disagree:
1 
1
steve mann
12:37 pm
Mar 25, 2012
No- I mean on defense-
1948 attacked by 6 Arab states.
1967- Egypt, Jordan and Syria plan to-gether to attack-Egypt`s Abdul Nassar masses his troops at the Israeli/Sinia border and orders the UN observers OUT.
1971- Egypt attacks across the Suez canal.
Suicide bombers from Islamic Jihadi groups within Gaza and the West Bank attack civilians in Bus Stations , cafe`s and on buses.
Sharon gives Gaza to the PA- pulls out every Jew and Israeli- And then rockets are fired on a daily basis.
That in my book is 60% on defense-
As has been said -
If the Arabs were to get rid of their weapons there would be peace-
If Israel were to- There would be no more Israel.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
1
steve mann
12:41 pm
Mar 25, 2012
I am sure Jimi can speak for themselves-
However it is only in recent years that these have had to “PopUp2
To counter the “LIES the Mis Information” that people like you (And you come over as a Jihadi Islamist- Dar ul-Harb Dar ul-Islam) Have been spreading for years.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Jimi
10:00 am
Apr 03, 2012
From your moronic rants it sounds like you’ve been sniffing too much glue lately.
Now be a good lad and go back to playing blind man’s buff on the motorway.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
2
Jimi
11:09 am
Apr 03, 2012
Don’t worry laddie; I’m certain that your attempts to become a Darwin Award winner will be rewarded eventually.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
2
steve mann
11:53 am
Apr 03, 2012
This guy “mine” amuses me. One voice he praises the Brit soldiers and rightly so, for assisting the liberation of Europe and hence the ending of the concentration camps- To which over 60,000 Jewish soldiers lost their lives in the operation of:
Then blames the Jews for having a land that the British Minister Balfour promised to them.
When the time came for that to happen- The British government RENEGED on its promise-
and chickened out.
This of course after in 1920 80% of the land promised was given to the Hashemite tribe from the Sahara Desert- now known as Jordan- This we hear very little about- no one ever says- Hashems go back to Saudi where you come from- this land is Palestinian!-do they?
Agree or Disagree:
3 
0
steve mann
11:48 am
Apr 17, 2012
Wow- the”mime” speaks- And what knowledge-
The Hashemites were from the Sahara Desert- Abdullah their leader assisted Lawernce in fighting the Turks to oust them from Palestine-
After the success and Britain ruled the area- Lawrence persuaded Wimston Churchill to give the Eastern side of the River Jordan to Abdullah and his people- nothing to do with the French- The French “Pinched ” the area now known as Syria- The place where their leader has killed 10000 of his own people, nice guy. So your history lesson to me was “Crap”-
And keep it up I just find you so amusing in your obvious childish hate- There are those who want to ignore you- I dont- I just laugh at your infantile rants- “Just found an Israeli demonstrator, so I smashed his face in with a rifle.” Doesn`t that just show others how your mind works-
You probably have never held a rifle in your life-
And you would probably mess your pants if you ever had to look down the barrel of one!
Cant wait for your next rant- As Nothing funnier on the TV.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Jimi
12:25 pm
Apr 17, 2012
Why am I not surprised that you fail to grasp the irony of comparing Jews to Nazis while at the same time making antisemitic comments yourself?
Could it perhaps be due to your single-digit IQ…
Agree or Disagree:
0 
1
Mickey Oberman
2:05 pm
Apr 17, 2012
DO NOT RESPOND
Ignore the ignoramus.
Don’t give him the satisfaction of arousing your ire.
HE IS NOT WORTH IT
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
steve mann
2:12 pm
Apr 17, 2012
I luv it- better than “Dads Army”-
Though I am a bit disappointed that you have not thought up a better line than the last one.
I think you need someone to feed you some better sound bites- Try an editor from the Di Sturmur.
No! that’s to complicated for you to understand- The Beano Comic might be more to your mentality-
Hey how about knocking on Mossely`s coffin- I know consult Amerdinijad or Assad -
I await the next installment. with bated breath. Thank you for the entertainment.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Avi
10:08 pm
Apr 18, 2012
Iranian-Islamic Justice
To MINE HR 2012–04–18 By Avi
Dear MINE
The following report is taken from “IRAN Human Rights” site, whose address is
http://www.iranhr.net/spip.php?article2440
The whole site, and this report, might be of interest to those twisted minds like your-self. You are even invited to move and live in Iran to witness (and most probably enjoy) these Islamic-Iranian daily “Actions”. Then you can complain about Jews, why do not they satisfy you like your dearest friend in Iran!?
But be careful there, because you might very well be one of them…
“2011: The highest number of annual executions in the past 11 years Sources: Amnesty International (AI) and Iran Human Rights (IHR):
• 2000: 165 (AI)
• 2001: 75 (AI)
• 2002: 316 (AI)
• 2003: 154 (AI)
• 2004: 108 (AI)
• 2005: 94 (AI)
• 2006: 177 (AI)
• 2007: 317 (AI)
• 2008: 350 (IHR), (346; AI)
• 2009: 402 (IHR), (388; AI)
• 2010: 546 (IHR) (adjusted to 646)*
• 2011: 676 (IHR) : Official: 416 non-official: 260
* 100 of the 140 executions in the province of South Khorasan (Birjand) that were confirmed by the Iranian officials have been added to the 2010 numbers”
Of course, this is nothing as compared with Syrian Asad who has killed so far about 9,000 men, women, old, and young and children of many Syrian Tribes. You seem to be very proud of your dear friends…
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Avi
11:03 am
Apr 23, 2012
To MINE, HR APRIL 23 2012 By Avi
Documentary of Moslem brutal attack on Graves of Australian Defenders
Dear MINE and all those who think like you
You will probably enjoy every second of the following documentary evidence. You probably count it as a celebration when the Moslems destroy the Australian War Memorial Toombs and break the Christian and Jewish Memorial Stones of those who have sacrificed their lives to Protect Humanity from the Sadists of the last century.
Watch below and enjoy it:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f03_1330829653&p=1
You criticize Jews and Israel as much as you can. What would you do if some Jews would do what some of Moslems do?
As you can see in the documentary, not one Moslem, not a pack of them’ but a cult of them act so brutally against the dead, against other’s symbols, believes, culture, and heritage. And YOU dear mindless MINE, not only have no word of criticism, but most possibly enjoy and even support their primitivity and brutality!!!
Offence on graves of death, is a starting point of offence against humans.
There is a saying: “where books are burned, humans will be burned”
I say: “Where the graves are attacked, humans will be attacked as well”
I also say: “Where the symbols and signs of a culture are attacked, eventually also humans will be attacked”
So stop the “symbolic” attack before it is too late! NO tolerance and no forgiveness for verbal mines of mindless “MINES”.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
steve mann
2:16 pm
Apr 17, 2012
Micky- Thats what the Jews in Germany did- They ignored Hitler- thinking he would “go away”
We dont lay down anymore- We slag these vermin off in any way possible-
He/she irks me not- I amuse at its pathetic nonsense- and it shows others who use this site, those who are neither for or against- just what the Jews and Israelis have to challenge.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Mickey Oberman
3:35 pm
Apr 17, 2012
Steve,
Evil though he was and warped as it was, Hitler had a brain.
Mine, to quote one Steve Mann, who correctly assessed this perverted degenerate, “He would need a brain to be that clever!”
Mine only gets his lascivious thrills from irking others.
Don’t assist him in his masturbatory efforts.
DO NOT RESPOND
Mickey
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
steve mann
7:47 pm
Apr 17, 2012
Actually Micky- I have been looking over this “Things” posts.
I have and I think justifiably, come to the conclusion that it is a British Muslim of Pakistan descent.
These guys are cowards and thats why “It” tends to portray itself as a disgruntled ant-Semite.
of a fascist background. And “It” will not be very old-
Its an interesting hypothesis- And “Its” words and attitude fit the M.O.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Mickey Oberman
8:02 pm
Apr 17, 2012
That fits the MO of a
“drooling simpleton spawn of a marriage between two first cousins.”
“Agree or Disagree:”
Agree.
Mickey
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0