What’s the Real Story With Those “Apartheid Buses?”
March 4, 2013 17:06 by Pesach Benson
Everything you need to know about today’s coverage of Israel and the Mideast. Join the Israel Daily News Stream on Facebook.
Today’s Top Stories
1. The Commentator responds to Daily Telegraph coverage of so-called “apartheid” buses:
The substance is drearily familiar, though it is particularly gratuitous. It is (yawn) an “Israel-Apartheid” story, and it pegs off moves by the Israeli authorities to take the completely reasonable step of introducing extra Palestinian buses to ferry Palestinian workers into Israel from the West Bank.
There are two reasons for the move. First, there’s the obvious security issue: there is a dreadful history of Palestinian suicide bombing on Israeli buses. Israelis are understandably afraid, especially in the context of mass incitement by the Palestinian Authority, and would rather Palestinians took their trips to Israel on their own buses. (Are you absolutely sure you wouldn’t feel the same way?)
The second reason, which explains why Israel has made its move now, is that due to more generous arrangements for the Palestinians, Israel is now granting more work permits. More workers, more buses. More Palestinian workers, more buses for Palestinians. Not one of life’s great mysteries… unless you smell a conspiracy.
The UK media was far more interested in the story. Keep The Commentator in mind if you look at the Times of London, The Independent, The Guardian or Daily Mail.
2. Hamas income from smuggling taxes have declined to the point that the terror group muscled in on the PA-appointed concessionaire running the Palestinian side of the Kerem Shalom crossing. YNet writes:
The organization’s government in Gaza has notified Nahed Shuhaiber, the concessionaire who operates the Kerem Shalom crossing from the Palestinian side, that his responsibilities are being rescinded and that starting Monday morning, the new concessionaire will be Muhisan Sharafi. Monday morning, 70 trucks stood at the crossing waiting to bring goods into the Strip.
Because Shuhaiber operated the crossing on behalf of the Palestinian Authority and for this reason, Israel agreed for years to cooperate but Israel has also made a fundamental decision that the government and the defense establishment do not work opposite any Hamas-related entity . . .
Dagnot explained to officials in the PA that working with a new concessionaire without coordination constitutes a security risk.
If Hamas wants to make real money and act like a real government, it should end the tunneling business and simply trade everything above-board through Egypt with all the taxes it likes. That means foregoing the status of pious victimhood (Israel’s so-called “siege” of Gaza), but even the Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t buy that spin. A far more superficial AP report picked up on the crossing’s closure.
3. Martin Fletcher of NBC News visited Rawabi, a new Palestinian city being developed near Ramallah. I’m intrigued by the headline, which referred to Rawabi as a settlement. Rawabi’s a brand new community in the disputed West Bank territory, which I suppose technically makes it a settlement. Fletcher’s dispatch didn’t touch on that angle.
Israel and the Palestinians
• How many times has this happened to you? Hamas rejected a delivery of 28 long-range missiles smuggled from Libya after discovering they were tagged with Israeli tracking devices. Times of Israel coverage.
• Bad boy indeed. The Shin Bet busted a Hebron terror cell taking orders from Basel Heimuni, one of the Palestinian prisoners released to Gaza in the Gilad Shalit swap. Jerusalem Post coverage.
• Norway’s secretary of state acknowledges funding Palestinian incitement.
• Leave it to The Guardian to give hunger-striking Palestinian prisoner Samer Issawi an op-ed platform in its print edition. You get the picture:
This is my last remaining stone to throw at the tyrants and jailers in the face of the racist occupation that humiliates our people.
• It’s that time of the year: Tufts Daily, the Duke Chronicle, and Harry’s Place weigh in on Israeli Apartheid Week.
• Ryerson U. student Eitan Gilboord was ticked off that his student union fees were funding Israeli Apartheid Week activities — among other idiocies. Now he’s pushing with an initiative to allow students to opt out of levies going to specific campus groups. The National Post took a look at the issue:
The fourth-year politics and governance student at Ryerson University believes students should easily be able to easily opt out of mandatory funding of students’ unions if they choose to take sides on controversial issues. . .
“If I disagree with the drop [tuition] fees campaign, at least that is something they are doing for [all] students,” he says. “But when you get into polarizing foreign policy issues that go against your own rules of singling out people on campus, I think that’s when we see the problem.” . . .
The minimal individual amounts likely convince many of the students who may disagree with their causes not to bother pursuing refunds, but with a student population in the tens of thousands, the 50¢ and $1.50 charges add up to tens of thousands of dollars in funding and even more if you include levies paid by graduate students.
• Worth reading:
The Media, Military and Modern Israel
Rest O’ the Roundup
• Worth reading: Time takes an in-depth look at the evolution of the Obama administration’s approach to the Iranian nuclear problem.
• Are Syria’s pro-Assad hackers up to something more nefarious?
The Post’s James Ball has suggested that pro-government hackers have actually begun acting as a sort of quasi-intelligence unit, “using the Internet to uncover members of the opposition” by advertising fake Facebook and Skype software that is embedded with spyware.
One malicious link, circulated on Syrian Twitter last year, purported to lead to a “fascinating video clip showing an attack on Syrian regime.” It actually coaxed Facebook users to give up their usernames and passwords, reports The Information Warfare Monitor.
For more, see yesterday’s Israel Daily News Stream.
Joan Stuchner
7:02 pm
Mar 04, 2013
Yes, of course it seems reasonable to have more buses, if more workers are crossing the border. But the report indicated that Palestinians had been ordered off one bus and made to sit on the ground in order to wait for the other buses. That observation contrasted with other comments from bus employees that no one can be forced off a bus, or barred from getting onto a bus. There was some confusion there, I’m afraid. Also, isn’t everyone – Palestinian and settler – searched before they get on a bus?
Also – why are Palestinians working in Israel? Israelis of all religions ought to be employed in Israel,
Agree or Disagree:
2 
4
anneinpt
9:26 am
Mar 05, 2013
I haven’t read the report about Palestinians being ordered off a bus and being told to sit on the floor. From what I’ve read, these bus lines are non-coercive. The separation is unenforceable, and therefore has no relation to apartheid.
No one is searched before getting on a bus in Israel or the settlements. The bus arrives, you all get on, just like anywhere else in the world.
As for why Palestinians work in Israel – you’re right. It should be Israelis. But since there are job slots available which Israelis don’t want to fill, and the Palestinians want to work, can you imagine what world reaction would be if Israel did NOT allow them to work in Israel?! Shock! horror! discrimination!
Agree or Disagree:
3 
0
Asher Garber
12:29 am
Mar 06, 2013
Got a link, Joan? And while you’re at it, got a credible link, Joan? No, the Guardian is not credible. Any Arab news outlet is not credible. Credibility lies in the ability to actually report the news and not some 2nd hand knowledge that really isn’t anything less than nefarious bs dressed up as propaganda.
Israel. Size of New Jersey. Same age as Pakistan. The world sure likes to be befuddled.
I think back to the 1972 Olympics when I think about the world’s inability to actually digest the real news in front of them.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Frank Adam
12:29 am
Mar 05, 2013
This is bent twice over.
Who remembers the feminist activist’s court case within the last two years over religious communities sitting in buses separately? She got on a bus route in the NW Negev which was organised between religious suburbs/quarters. All very silly. I do not agree with either party but it could have all been handled with more tact and fewer lawyers.
This is another similar clumsy, deliberate stirring of the mud on the stream bed.
As for the apartheid – black S,Africans were citizens. Everybody agrees the “West Bank [of Jordan]” Arabs are NOT Israeli citizens and by their own Arab admission at war with Israel. To be treated as equals they have to make peace.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
14 
0
Matityahu
3:04 am
Mar 05, 2013
The Admission by Norway’s Secretary of State that it finances illegal activities will enable Norway to be regarded as an accessory to such activities and therefore be liable for damages caused by such activities. The Lawyers say thank you for the business.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
4 
0
emes
1:38 pm
Mar 05, 2013
If a palestinian woman who had been treated in hospital could return to the hospital with bombing equipment under her clothing, ready to be detinated within the hospital, then searching the unpredictable enemy within by removing him/her from a bus, is a small price to pay for the safeguard of Israeli citizens!
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
4 
0
huldah
8:18 am
Mar 06, 2013
Whatever the truth of the story, someone in authority should have realised how it would be spun by Israel’s enemies and taken steps to pre-empt the inevitable accusations of apartheid. It would have made no difference to a hostile media, but it would have meant that Israel’s friends would not have been dismayed by learning about the story from them.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
BistChoitty
5:58 am
Apr 10, 2013
Nice post. I find out something additional challenging on distinctive blogs everyday. It is going to generally be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice somewhat some thing from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog no matter if you don’t mind. Natually I’ll provide you with a link on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.
christian louboutin ankle boots
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0