As two Palestinian terrorists murder Jewish worshipers in a Jerusalem synagogue, what were the media’s first reactions?
The Irish Times portrays Yasser Arafat as a successful statesman and freedom fighter, holding Israel responsible for the breakdown of the peace process.
The International Business Times labels Rabbi Yehuda Glick a “militant.” It’s the same word that is used to describe the terrorist who shot him.
The Irish Times publishes what appears to be a deliberately constructed photo of a burning Koran, allegedly the result of a settler attack on a mosque.
The Independent posts a video of Palestinian protests from 2011 while claiming it to be recent footage.
A few days ago, the PLO warned foreign reporters not to use the name “Temple Mount” in reports about the Jerusalem holy site. The thrust of its argument is that the Temple Mount is located in occupied territory, and any reference to the site other than the Noble Sanctuary (Haram al Sharif in Arabic) encroaches…
It’s a parent’s worst nightmare. I was outside walking my dog when I got the call from my daughter.
The Daily Mail erroneously refers to Tel Aviv as Israel’s capital.
The New York Times changes its headline following two terror attacks, suggesting that Palestinians were only “suspected” of murdering two Israelis.
Does the media hold U.S. airstrikes on ISIS in Iraq to the same standards that they held Israeli strikes on Gaza?