In The Guardian, author David Rieff argues that “Israel offers a florid illustration of how disastrously collective memory can deform a society.”
The Guardian refers to right-wing Israeli group Im Tirtzu as “extra-paramilitary.” Was this subconscious bias at work?
The Guardian’s sub-header states as fact, an allegation that a Palestinian woman was raped and tortured by the Israeli military after carrying out a terrorist bombing in 1969.
The Toronto Star posts a video by “comedian” Scott Vrooman promoting BDS through anti-Israel lies and libels.
Pretty weak of The Independent to recycle a 2013 commentary by Matt Hill on whether Israel’s an apartheid state. An editor’s note at the bottom of the commentary acknowledges this, without explaining why. I’ll get to my theory in a moment. It’s Israel Apartheid Week in the UK, and Hill’s dusted-off argument is that the apartheid…
The Huffington Post becomes a platform for encouraging its readers to adopt the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israeli goods.
Business Insider illustrates positive achievements for working Israeli women with a politicized photo featuring a Palestinian flag.
Extremist Israeli Arab MK Haneen Zoabi publishes a series of misleading statements and outright lies about Israel in Newsweek.
More Palestinian terror attacks mean more screwy headlines. Context and accuracy took a hit. Without question, today’s worst headline was served up by the Irish Times. For readers who initially wrote us about this screwy Associated Press header (cached version), the wire service subsequently updated the headline. Most papers around the world updated their AP wire…
According to a Guardian headline, Israelis are allowed to defend themselves against Palestinian attackers only once they have been injured.