New York Times Irks BibiDecember 18, 2011 12:42 by Simon Plosker
It seems that a Thomas Friedman New York Times column in which he states that the standing ovation for PM Netanyahu in the US Congress last May “was bought and paid for by the Israel lobby” is the final straw. The Jerusalem Post reports:
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is refusing to pen an op-ed piece for The New York Times, signaling the degree to which he is fed up with the influential newspaper’s editorial policy on Israel.
In a letter to the Times obtained by The Jerusalem Post on Thursday, Netanyahu’s senior adviser Ron Dermer – in response to the paper’s request that Netanyahu write an op-ed – wrote that the prime minister would “respectfully decline.”
Dermer made clear that this had much to do with the fact that 19 of the paper’s 20 op-ed pieces on Israel since September were negative.
Ironically, the one positive piece was written by Richard Goldstone – chairman of the UN’s Goldstone Commission Report – defending Israel against charges of apartheid.
“We wouldn’t want to be seen as ‘Bibiwashing’ the op-ed page of The New York Times,” Dermer said, in reference to a piece called “Israel and Pinkwashing” from November. In that piece, a City University of New York humanities professor lambasted Israel for, as Dermer wrote, “having the temerity to champion its record on gay rights.”
That piece, he wrote, “set a new bar that will be hard for you to lower in the future.”
Indeed, between the aforementioned “pinkwashing” piece and the New York Times’ continuing inability to morally distinguish between Palestinian terror and Israeli responses, to name but two recent examples, the bar really isn’t very high at all.