The New York Times’s Diaa Hadid implies that there is something nefarious about Israeli security measures designed to limit their impact on the wider Palestinian population.
An otherwise fair and balanced article in Newsweek includes an inflammatory headline referring to Israeli “apartheid.”
The Times of London’s headline describes a neutralized Palestinian terrorist as a “helpless man.”
AFP’s headline refers to a Hamas “fighter” while implying the terrorist was a member of a “party.”
Another Palestinian terror attack, another headline fail, this time from Australia’s ABC News.
CNN article on Palestinian terror attack seems unsure about whether the “terrorist” “murdered” a civilian.
Multiple Palestinian terror attacks across Israel generate another batch of headline shockers.
When American police shoot a madman with a machete, the headlines say so. But when a terrorist dies in Israel, while IN THE ACT of attacking, the headlines are just plain shocking.
According to a Guardian headline, Israelis are allowed to defend themselves against Palestinian attackers only once they have been injured.
As of this writing, it has been several hours since Shlomit Krigman, a 24 year old Israeli woman, was murdered by Palestinian terrorists. The headlines in the Guardian and New York Times remain unchanged.