In a shocking piece of unprofessional journalism, the International Business Times attempts to promote the Israeli apartheid libel by way of questionable and biased sources, distorted facts and lack of context.
It was a clear-cut case of self-defense. And Reuters blew it. Imagine you’re a headline writer and a story reaches your desk that a Palestinian has infiltrated settlement farm in the Hebron Hills and stabbed an Israeli man in front of his horrified family. The victim managed to shoot the terrorist, who was subsequently…
An ABC guide to the two-state solution aims to clear up any confusion on the issue for its readers. Instead it leads its readers to adopt the Palestinians’ favored and distorted version of history and the conflict, leading to only more confusion.
The Guardian praises Israeli Member of Knesset Haneen Zoabi, who has built her political identity around proud and open support for terror, violence and anti-Semitism
Newsweek’s Jack Moore makes false claim that Israelis ram Palestinians with cars too.
The International Business Times relies on a Hamas-supporting hate site to accuse Israel of using a Palestinian child as a human shield.
Writing in the New Matilda, Kristen Zornada attacks Israel for alleged mistreatment of Palestinian children in Israeli jails.
The Guardian and AFP are more concerned about the location of fires near Jewish settlements than the fires themselves.
The New Statesman acts as a mouthpiece for the extremist Palestine Solidarity Campaign, publishing a one-sided article that demonizes Israel and ignores the existence of Palestinian terrorism.
Reuters maintains that the Palestinian village of Al Jab’a on the West Bank is going thirsty. Guess who is to blame?