The Independent’s columnist serves up another one-sided op-ed.
A misleading photograph is removed from the Sky website.
CityTV and The Guardian’s inadequate responses to your complaints.
CityTV compounds an unforgiveable error with an substandard correction.
The Guardian’s website includes the Hamas “military wing” on its “Useful links”.
Why are an NGO’s allegations against Israel accepted by an unquestioning media?
The smaller media needs watching as well.
Initial BBC and the AFP headlines ignore the victims in second bulldozer attack
MSM looks for “motives” to explain brutal bulldozer attack
Is the media really covering the “ceasefire”?