Our third annual recognition of the most skewed and biased coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
News photos of Israel's security fence distort its physical properties, and a Boston Globe op-ed misrepresents its placement in the West Bank.
The two largest wire agencies release chronicles of world terror that completely ignore attacks in Israel.
An IDF video disproves incriminating media claims from the day before, yet many outlets ignore or bury the new information.
Cloudy headlines and rationalization of terror characterize BBC and Reuters coverage of the Negohot attack.
In the wake of "The Children's Attack," profiles of families victimized by terror deserve to be reprinted broadly.
Headlines of reports on the Hezbullah terror attack state only the Israeli response, framing Israel as the aggressor.
A one-month study of Reuters headlines reveals clear bias in Reuters' Mideast coverage.
Continued media use of the terms "tit-for-tat" and "cycle of violence" contradicts the actual nature of the conflict.
A comparison of media reports from Iraq and Israel on civilian deaths at checkpoints.