A review of some of the worst examples of media bias from the recent conflict
A Reuters photo turns out to be an outright lie, manipulated to make damage in Beirut appear much worse than reality.
Reuters' global managing editor acknowledges that Arab intimidation influences his agency's news coverage.
A success for media monitors: Reuters finally begins describing Hamas accurately.
Our third annual recognition of the most skewed and biased coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
News photos of Israel's security fence distort its physical properties, and a Boston Globe op-ed misrepresents its placement in the West Bank.
The two largest wire agencies release chronicles of world terror that completely ignore attacks in Israel.
An IDF video disproves incriminating media claims from the day before, yet many outlets ignore or bury the new information.
Cloudy headlines and rationalization of terror characterize BBC and Reuters coverage of the Negohot attack.
In the wake of "The Children's Attack," profiles of families victimized by terror deserve to be reprinted broadly.