Media manipulation is one of the most unfortunate aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We’ve seen papers blur the distinction between journalism and advocacy, fact-checking failures become fatal, photographers and Palestinians twist reality in mutually beneficial relationships, semantics become politicized and news executives cover up news to protect access. We’ve even seen journalists abuse readers who dared to disagree. None…
The Guardian deliberately edits relevant sections questioning Jewish responsibility for an alleged arson attack from an AFP copy.
Anti-Israel extremist Ben White is given a platform by Newsweek to mislead its readers on the topic of administrative detention.
The Times of London’s Greg Carlstrom ignores the Palestinian terrorist murder of Dafna Meir in favor of a story on Israeli price fixing of school trips to Poland.
Just how far will The Guardian go in order to promote its anti-Israel agenda by making changes to the Associated Press’s original content?
Two Palestinian teenage girls are shot while carrying out a terror attack in Jerusalem. The Daily Mail’s headline portrays them as victims of Israel.
CNN reports on a terrorist incident but fails to tell its readers who the seemingly anonymous terrorist was.
You know there’s a problem when an anchor has to correct an eyewitness correspondent on live TV. Ayman Moyheldin’s and NBC News bias are brutally exposed.
CNN’s headline stated that Jewish holy site Joseph’s Tomb simply “caught fire” even though it was torched by a Palestinian mob.
The Associated Press asks why Palestinian residents of Jerusalem are involved in terror but omits some important facts and context.