Israel's partner in peace, and America's strongest Arab ally, is flaming the fans of hatred in its government-backed media.
In a classic case of imbalanced reporting, media reports pour in about the blockade of Palestinian towns — but nothing about the blockade imposed on Israelis.
The New York Times singles out Israeli settlers as a separate class of people. By doing so, it strengthens the hand of Palestinians perpetrating attacks.
When HonestReporting questioned the use of the terms "terrorists" and "militants," the BBC admitted to applying an arbitrary double-standard.
When a Western target is hit, it's the work of "terrorists." When an Israeli target is hit, it's the work of "militants." Why?
Two notorious anti-Israel reporters gang up to cover the same piece of propaganda – and use nearly identical language in the process.
When the British Guardian responds in less-than-honorable fashion, the director of HonestReporting gives them a calm, rational lashing.
We've analyzed hundreds of publications for anti-Israel bias. The British Guardian seems among the worst.
With Israeli elections in the news, many publications are unleashing ferocious attacks on Prime Minister-elect Ariel Sharon.
An article in the January 2001 issue of Harper's Magazine lambastes Israel for the worst crimes, including "barbarism," "fierce prejudice," "systematic violence," and even "ethnic cleansing."