By giving a platform to someone with downright ridiculous views, CNN (and other media who have in the past published his rantings) is guilty of lending journalistic legitimacy where none should exist.
The jihad’s brainwashing machines are not alone; they are backed by the lies against Israel in the media and in the academia.
The Economist in mentioning Palestinian terror attacks treats the perpetrators as victims of the very acts that they themselves carried out.
The International Business Times labels Rabbi Yehuda Glick a “militant.” It’s the same word that is used to describe the terrorist who shot him.
It’s a parent’s worst nightmare. I was outside walking my dog when I got the call from my daughter.
Does the media hold U.S. airstrikes on ISIS in Iraq to the same standards that they held Israeli strikes on Gaza?
UK-based Israeli academic and longtime Israel critic Avi Shlaim has weighed in on the Gaza war in the Guardian’s Comment is Free section, and predictably, he unleashed a scathing critique of Israel. To do so, however, Shlaim invokes a logic so twisted, it’s hard to believe he himself subscribes to it. For example, he insists…
While they may not be vocal about it, foreign journalists in Gaza have noticed Hamas’ human shields tactics as the terrorists operate within the population.
Radical anti-Israel Norwegian doctor Mads Gilbert reappears in the media for the latest Gaza conflict.
An analysis of Gaza’s casualty figures brings into question the number of Palestinian civilians killed in Israel’s Operation Protective Edge.