Our eighth annual recognition of the most skewed and biased coverage of the Mideast conflict.
Some media employ Palestinian terminology following a stabbing in a Jerusalem neighborhood.
A poisonous pen scribbles in South Africa while an old canard resurfaces in Australia.
Why does the Economist single out Tel Aviv for negative treatment?
A Jerusalem Post expose shows deep links between Arafat and Saddam.
As President Bush calls for Palestinian democracy, some columnists criticize the idea.
Evidence to counteract claims in the British media and elsewhere of Israeli impropriety at Jenin.
As Palestinian factions step up the terror, the media gives Arafat the soapbox and portrays him as a heroic seeker of peace.
In a lengthy background piece on the Mideast crisis, the UK Economist somehow manages to avoid mentioning the Israeli point of view anywhere in the article.