TV Host Refuses to Back Down After Calling Israel a “Cancer”
October 28, 2012 16:55 by Simon PloskerOn Tuesday 23 October, Irish broadcaster Vincent Browne referred to Israel as a “cancer” during his live show on TV3 channel’s Tonight With Vincent Brown.
In a discussion on the recent televised US presidential foreign policy debate between Republican challenger Mitt Romney and Democrat President Barack Obama, Browne lamented that Israel had barely been mentioned, stating:
Israel is the cancer in foreign affairs. It polarizes the Islamic community of the world against the rest of the world.
Unless you deal with the problem of Israel and the Palestinians in that part of the world, there’s going to be conflict and disharmony. It’s a massive injustice — they stole the land from the Arabs.
According to the Irish Independent:
Mr Browne admitted that his choice of language could have been better but insisted that the criticism was justified.
“What I resent is the suggestion that because you’re critical of Israel, you’re automatically anti-Semitic. I don’t think that’s acceptable,” he said.
Mr Browne refused to apologise for his remarks, saying that Israel was founded in 1948 by taking land from the Arabs.
He said it was “blackmail” to try to brand everyone who was critical of Israel as anti-Semitic. “I don’t think I differ too much from Irish or European foreign policy,” he said.
That Browne’s first response was to deny that he is an anti-Semite speaks volumes. Browne’s defense is often employed by some of Israel’s harshest critics who attempt to claim that supporters of Israel are smearing them as anti-Semites in a backhanded effort to silence them.
For while his comments were described as anti-Semitic, Browne himself has not been accused of being an anti-Semite. Instead, Browne cannot even bring himself to apologize, preferring to dismiss criticism as illegitimate.
The Jewish Chronicle reports:
Defending his remarks, Mr Browne said that by calling Israel a cancer “I didn’t mean it should be eliminated. It was an infelicitous use of the word.
“The reality is the Israeli state was founded by confiscation of land previously occupied by Arabs. That injustice is at the centre of the conflict.”
Vincent Browne evidently does not understand the difference between legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and his outrageous statements meant to demonize an entire country. It is doubtful that Browne would have referred to any other country as a “cancer” – a term used by anti-Semites aimed at Jews and Israel.
Indeed, Browne should have realized just how far beyond the pale he has gone when one considers that the most vocal proponent of such disgusting language is Iranian President Ahmadinejad who, in a diatribe last August, stated:
The Zionist regime and the Zionists are a cancerous tumour. Even if one cell of them is left in one inch of (Palestinian) land, in the future this story (of Israel’s existence) will repeat.
Israel’s deputy ambassador to Ireland Nurit Tinari-Modai said: “We today received phone calls and emails from outraged Irish people who intend to complain about Mr. Brown’s ongoing hateful comments towards the Jewish people and the Jewish state.”
According to the Irish Independent, however, a TV3 spokeswoman said she was not aware of any complaints being made about Mr Browne’s remarks.
Let’s see if we can change that. Send your considered comments to TV3 and demand an apology and the right of reply for a pro-Israel guest on Vincent Browne’s show - complaints@tv3.ie
Please consider clicking +1, Tweet, Like or linking to this article on your blog or website. This article is only effective if it reaches a large readership, especially through the Google search engine. Creating a link to this page with the text “Vincent Browne Cancer” helps this article reach the first page search results for the term.
StorminNorm
9:08 pm
Nov 19, 2012
This SCHMUCK…Mr. Browne stated…“The reality is the Israeli state was founded by confiscation of land previously occupied by Arabs. That injustice is at the centre of the conflict.”….
…..IN FACT…The state of Israel was founded on land confiscated from the arabs…living on land confiscated from the Jews…etc. all….throw in the Turks, The Moors and the Brits among others.
Another fact is that beginning with the Zionist movement in the early 1900′s the Jews began buying up the Palestine wasteland from itinerant arabs who couldn’t leave the place fast enough!!! Also the Palestinians WERE the Jews living in that area pre 1948.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
89 
22
M.Sphardi
8:34 pm
Feb 25, 2013
Of course, he neglects to point out that the Arabs, in revenge for the defeat of their five invading armies, stole Jewish lands in the Arab world five times the size of Israel.
Wrong, most of the Arab lands the Jews bought were unproductive and leased by poor itinerant fellahin from Syria. The absentee landlords sold at the price of good Iowa farmland and the Jewish buyers often, unexpectedly found themselves in courts attempting to vacate the lands in order to take possession. The Arab sellers felt no obligation to inform the Jewish buyers in advance that the lands had been leased to impecunious Arab farmers desperately trying to wrest an income from sandy or marshy wasteland.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Peter Schulman
1:26 am
Nov 20, 2012
I’m responding to Irish “journalist” Vincent Browne’s comment that “Israel is the cancer in foreign affairs.” In defending his remarks he said it was an infelicitous use of the word.
That article made me think that Vincent Browne is an ugly, mean-spirited, racist, demagogic, propagandist shill for the Palestinian public-relations effort. But, on sober reflection, I realize that combination of words may have been infelicitous, particularly since ugliness is in the eye of the beholder.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
63 
14
pols
3:20 pm
Nov 21, 2012
Vincent Browne is ignorant of what He said because He don’t know nothing but opinion from lack of knowledge of what is a real Jew. There is no name Palestinian in the Qu’ran but there is Israel for jewish people in the Qu’ran. Therefore even the religion of Arabs says that Israel is for Jewish not for Arab…… In our Bible Israel is a promise land for Jews……..
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
49 
10
muchael
4:11 pm
Nov 23, 2012
What never ceases to amaze me is how the multitude of Jews who were living in Israel in 1948 are being ignored.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
49 
9
Sergio DellaPergola
4:06 pm
Jan 02, 2013
Year Palestinians Jewish Population
1877 426,908 (97%) 13,942 (3%)
1925 780,568 (85%) 137,484 (15%)
1946 1,339,763 (69%) 602,586 (31%)
After a visit to Palestine in 1891, Ahad Ha’am wrote:
From abroad, we are accustomed to believe that Eretz Israel is presently almost totally desolate, an uncultivated desert, and that anyone wishing to buy land there can come and buy all he wants. But in truth it is not so. In the entire land, it is hard to find tillable land that is not already tilled.
According to Paul Masson, a French economic historian, “wheat shipments from the Palestinian port of Acre had helped to save southern France from famine on numerous occasions.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
8 
4
Ray
5:31 pm
Jan 03, 2013
It is so interesting that you say Mr Ahad Ha’am points out this issue as fact.
Palestinians – Jewish Population
Palestinians 1877 426,908 Jewish (97%) 13,942 (3%)
Palestinians 1925 780,568 Jewish (85%) 137,484 (15%)
Palestinians 1946 1,339,763 Jewish (69%) 602,586 (31%)
Between 1887 – 1946 there must have been a massive change – Because there are many who travelled through this land during this era and have a completely differing point of view.
One of these many writers, Mr. Clements (Mark Twain) tells a different tale. He speaks of the land being mostly uncultivated and the people were sparse in number over a greater area in 1887- obviously it would seem many more later in 1946. You might like to take a look at some of his writings/ notes on the subject. In particular a book ‘The Innocents Abroad,’ 1887- a travel guide, I believe or something of that nature.
If you really have some time you should also take a look at the French and British Military Documentation relating to that area and era. It too tells a different story as well.
Having said that I would point out that the possibility of a million members of a particular race being implanted into another country does in no way suggest that that country belongs too them either completely or indeed specifically.
You should look at the centuries that Israel has had a hand lived, fought and died in the area you speak of, this being so would in its own merit give them carte blanc.
You did however leave out the issue of the surrounding Arab nations forcing out and demanding that the Arabs living in this area prior to ‘their’ incursion into the territory after 1946 that you so elegantly mention.
I have no doubt that there were those who did work hard and produced supplies for hungry French people. The French were already in the land doing other things? ‘Payment’ to stay was in deed an incentive. You will need to read a little more social and political history. However, the same could be said of Ireland, Israel or Palestine when the British moved into these countries and took the land accounting numbers of English population and their incursion of money and power whereby this has an issue not dissimilar to the one you mention (This did not make Ireland, English nor Palestine, Arab)
Just because there were more people of a differing race in a country, this is not an actual reality marker of ownership.
Ray
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
17 
4
m
5:50 pm
Jan 03, 2013
Ray, you composed an articulate, interesting and factual comment. Excellent job, thanks for posting.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
11 
1
StorminNorm
2:19 am
Jan 04, 2013
Ray…Ray…Ray….tell me baby….why do you insist on referring to the a-raaabs as Palestinians, and the Jews that resided there as the Jews as if they had no business there???
“Before 1948, Palestinian meant Jewish!!! In 1948 after the UN vote to partition, The Palestinians changed the name to Israel and themselves to Israeli’s!!! The Palestinian Arabs are a myth created by Yes-Sir Are-a-Rat in the mid 60′s!!! Between 48 and 67, the land the so-called arab “palestinians” claim as their homeland was occupied by jordan and egypt, and they didn’t care.
simply put, the arabs that resided there are pawns of other arabs with more power that want to fight Israel indirectly…
continued:
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
18 
4
StorminNorm
2:31 am
Jan 04, 2013
continued:
The so-called Palestinians of today are arabs, indigenous to arabia, not the middle east.
There is no distinct arab palestinian language, culture, music, history, art, religion, food or anything else!!!”
SO RAY… I REPEAT AGAIN…”.why do you insist on referring to the a-raaabs as Palestinians, and the Jews that resided there as the Jews as if they had no business there???”
That in itself is an example of anti-Semitism!!!
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
16 
5
emes
3:10 pm
Jan 04, 2013
Great acknowledgment Mr Stormin’ with clarity and truth of this volatile and extremely chewed-over situation couldn’t have put it better myself! if only the rest of the world could accept Israel as the land it was meant to be, it would be a force to be reckoned with for everyone’s benefit, unfortunately all its resources are used for defence and all efforts and motives predetermined for survival.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
7 
2
Ray
2:02 am
Jan 23, 2013
Hi StorminNorm,
I have been a little busy – It would seem that I made a mistake in my previous message (I will in future refer to Palestine (Israel) as the land of the Jews)
My desire to see the education of people on this subject includes myself. I am no expert as you can see from my small in put.
If I were to ask a favour, I would ask that people would help educate one another in the understanding of this complexed issue with patience and understanding.
I personally am on a steep learning curve and am willing to accept input from others in the Know as it were. I would also ask that you do so with quality factual information so that I and others on this site, might digest and learn.
This will not happen if we dance around the site using terminology that offends.
Thanks, I look forward to learning from your input in the future.
Ray
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
4 
0
Stormin'Norm
2:51 am
Jan 23, 2013
Ray…you are a gentleman & a scholar…
Your problem was that you were just quoting numbers….most of the arabs living in the Palestine areas weren’t citizens of the country…mostly roaming tribes and people from the surrounding countries without a commitment to the land….and again…there never was a Palestine Arab People who were in charge of or governed that country!!! The Jews had a presence and government there as far back as 1200 BCE or so…with the advent of Zionism in the late 1800′s they began purchasing land and developing the swamps into rich fertile farmland, with an eye on the future. Their plan was not to move the arabs out but to re-create their ancient homeland!!!
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
7 
1
Ray
2:57 am
Jan 23, 2013
Hi Storminorman,
You are most welcome.. thanks for this information.
Ray
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
M.Sphardi
4:48 pm
Feb 07, 2013
I appreciate the veracity of your citations, but I guess at the context and motives of the people you quote. My family lived here through the period you cite and their view is/was quite different. Do note that Ahad Haam used the qualifying word “tillable.” Most of the land had become UNtillable. Sixty years ago, Prof. Loudermilk of the UN told me that destructive grazing on tree bark, by Arab sheep and goats led to erosion, and drastic loss of topsoil.” It would take a thousand trucks working 24 hours a day for a 1000 years to put back the eroded soil on the Judean hills.” My grandfather died of malaria from the swampy land of Palestine. Many were blinded by belharzia prevalent then.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
emes
8:00 pm
Feb 07, 2013
M Sphardi, I understand your story of the Judean Hills – the Arabs have no regard for the land, wherever they are – and the ancient stories of Israel (Palestina) reads that the land was not just beautiful but fruitful and generous to all who lived there. As a prime example of land which has eroded, look no further than Easter Island, where the early inhabitants cut down the majority of trees to roll those “staring statues” down to the coast, thus the soil turned to dust thereby nothing could grow – the residents starved but not before turning canabalistic. We are caretakers of this world and as such should tend it accordingly – unfortunately too many are taking too much from the earth.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
0
Melvin
5:20 pm
Feb 25, 2013
Mark Twain would disagree… who did the census?
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Isabella, Tampa FL
4:26 pm
Nov 23, 2012
Such as this TV guy, there is no one as blind as one that WILL NOT see. Whatever hatred warps their minds is the work of evil, not merely misunderstanding.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
29 
5
Subee
7:27 am
Jan 18, 2013
I agree with you….
The Arabs that occupy Israel were living in Jordan and Yassa Arafat brought them to Israel. He was a clever person as he made millions on the money we sent to help these “poor Arabs”.
Israel should not divide her land any more. PERIOD
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
9 
0
m
7:33 pm
Jan 18, 2013
You are right, Israel should not give away another millimetre of Jewish land. Every time they give away land for “piss”, they got bombs in return. And ESPECIALLY not give anything of the Shomron Yehuda away; that is the ancestral homeland of Jewish people NOT arabs.
And as for those that want to change Canada and the USA, they can go to hell. Our countries are based on Judaeo-Chrsitian values, morals and culture. If anyone doesn’t like that they can bloody well leave fro some islamic cesspool where I’m sure they would be ever so much content anf “free”.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
9 
2
Peter Wilson
9:07 am
Nov 25, 2012
I notice the old chestnut of “anti-semitism” being bandied about here. Can you please explain if it is fact possible to criticise Israel and not be labelled anti-semetic,
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
19 
9
StorminNorm
10:07 am
Nov 25, 2012
Of course it’s possible to criticize Israel without being anti-Semitic…depending on who is doing the criticizing……friend or foe…Jew or Gentile….more often than not it reflects a latent anti-Semitism or hidden anti-Jewish hostility. Patrick Buchanan & Andrew Sullivan are examples of anti-Semites who are openly anti-Israel. Both are Roman Catholics from the olde school who were probably taught to be Jew haters as children…now they criticize Israel incessantly as a way to express their dislike of Jews.
Why do you call “anti-Semitism an old chestnut”??? Anti-Semitism is very much alive today and very virulent….do you NOT understand that???
Why are you asking that question?
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
34 
8
StorminNorm
10:28 am
Nov 25, 2012
continued…
If 3 Democratic American Presidents criticized Israel today….
Bill Clinton: is considered a friend and definitely not anti-Semitic…it would be accepted as honest criticism.
Barack Obama: because of dubious things in his background…he is still NOT totally accepted as a friend of the Jews…therefore any criticism of Israel would be suspect.
Jimmie Carter: because of his total support of the palestinians and /or other arabs and regardless of the provocation he will jump to attack Israel. He is definitely considered an anti-Semite by Jews & Israeli’s and reviled by them.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
33 
4
Jack McElroy
8:03 pm
Dec 04, 2012
G’day Peter – yes of course. Every country can be criticised for stupid things it does at times – Israel included. H/ever the facts of the criticism need to be correct. And the person/organization criticizing also needs to be open to criticism if it is wrong in the facts. When one reads some of the viscious incorrect statements about the Jewishs tate of Israel its pretty hard not to equate those with anti-semitism.
Peace from Down Under brother.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
17 
2
Ray
5:39 pm
Jan 03, 2013
Hi Peter,
Criticism on it’s own, especially if it is not correct , causes anger and misunderstandings.
Having said this, Constructive criticism and truth will cause, hopefully deeper and more practical issues to come to the surface for greater understanding.
The ‘TRUTH’ will set us all free
Ray
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
4 
0
emes
12:31 am
Jan 04, 2013
Ray, in your response to Peter’s comments, your reply, though commendable, is one that, for me, holds all the similarities of our worst segment in WW11 – we were told, what we thought was the truth – “Arbet mach frei” (work makes you free) – and look how that lie panned out! – Truth is that hope in which people find comfort but more often than not the facade of our beliefs become strangled in the bitter entrails of wavering ‘truisms’ – Israel gave land away for peace, more than once – what happened to that peace? it got lost in rockets and distortions of the truth from the very people Israel gives aid, to the detriment of its own.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
9 
1
Peter Schulman
1:37 pm
Nov 25, 2012
Is it possible to criticize Israel without being seen as anti-semitic? Of course. It’s just that it is difficult to view as benign the phrase “Israel is the cancer in foreign affairs,” unless his reference to the word cancer is referring to the sign of the zodiac. But not only did he not use that defense, he didn’t capitalize it. He did not refer to specific actions being cancerous, but Israel itself, which seems to mean the fact that it exists.It is difficult not to infer anti-semitism from the use of such a vituperative phrase which, I am convinced, reflects far more malice than infelicitous would suggest.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
22 
4
Joel Pressman
7:04 pm
Nov 26, 2012
Actually, the Jewish National Fund bought land in Israel before it’s U’N. division. Forget about 2000 years ago – in 1948, Jews had ownership of most of the lands apportioned to them.Arabs just could not live with that, and war began. Look at all the Muslem dominiated states, and don’t begrudge the Jews their tiny strip of earth.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
32 
3
Natalie Roberts
3:50 am
Jan 17, 2013
I remember the blue and white coin boxes in our home, in which we collected money for the Jewish National Fund to purchase land in Palestine. That was pre-1948, and pre-WW II – because many Jews believed in a return to cultivate and reclaim the land of our ancestors. As we have said for thousands of years on Passover: “If I forget thee Oh Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its cunning.” No mention of Jerusalem in the Qu-oran, although the Arabs now find it convenient to love Jerusalem.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
7 
0
StorminNorm
8:29 am
Jan 17, 2013
Natalie
Back in the early 50′s I was given a Picture Book called “The Young Palestinians”, It was published in the mid 40′s, it was the story of the Jews and how they were turning the land of Palestine into the Land of Honey by converting swampland into rich farm land.
Later I found an old set of 78 LP’s called “Music of the Palestinians, Jewish Music of the Desert”. Both of these are examples of who the Palestinians were prior to 1948. The arabs that resided there were nothing more than itinerant workers that had settled there from surrounding arab countries.
Then Arafat arrived on the scene in the 1960′s and decided he would create a new kingdom of arabs with himself as emperor…..
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
8 
0
PATRICIA JONES
7:57 am
Dec 03, 2012
Browne’s comments make me bilious. Of their own accord 600,000 odd Palestinian Arabs fled a war zone which their illustrious leaders had created. An estimated 250,000 of those refugees left in 1948 even before it became a war zone. Notwithstanding it was a human tragedy in the making Arab refugees were neither hapless targets nor innocent bystanders – as Browne likes to suggest. The 1948 war was interethnic or anti-Zionist civil war in which Palestinian Arabs were the aggressors and initiators.
If the Palestinians are ever to have a state of their own they have to prove their bona fides by agreeing to a lasting peace contract and stating the RIGHT OF ISRAEL TO EXIST.
Be’ahavat Yisrael,
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
29 
3
Rueil2
3:49 pm
Dec 09, 2012
He is 100% correct in his comments. Perhaps he could have chosen his vocabulary a bit better, but his assessment of the situation is spot-on.
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
16
emes
9:51 pm
Dec 11, 2012
Rueil2 – with “friends” like you, who needs enemies – but then again you are no friend of the Jews, nor Israel, you should look in the mirror and know what a demonic reflection looks back. If you were in our corner you would understand what we need to do to maintain a country to its best advantage and to house its inhabitants in homes suitable for families embracing the history of the Jewish homeland, instead of living in squalor for years on end like the Palestinians enjoyed to gain the world’s sympathy – These palestinians had a home in Jordan but chose to make way for arab warmongers during the six day war – got stuck in no mans land and, to be blunt, crapped in their own turban!
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
14 
4
Nathan
7:39 pm
Jan 09, 2013
What land was King David king of?
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
5 
0
Subee
7:17 am
Jan 18, 2013
Piers is the Cancer….he is a blight to the American way and to a Country built on Christian / Judo principles.
I say to Mr. Morgan …go back to Britain. We don’t want you and your polluted thinking and actions here. We have enough problem people and we don’t need you too.
Leave Israel alone , she has many backers here.
With your non-intelligent way of thinking you have no right to pass judgement on anyone.
GO HOME TO BRITAIN…..and stay.
Agree or Disagree:
3 
0
beau milos
7:37 am
Jan 20, 2013
mr Brown is a anti-semite to call a whole nation a cancer who does he think he is. he must think westerners are all stupid. the fall of Israel is the fall of the west. mr brown is a another leftist traitor seeking the demise of the GOD blessed judeo-christian west. this is a war between east and west like ww1 and the crusaudes, after ww2 was the recreation of isael and never will they be uprooted from their forfathers land…..oh man could I go on !!!! the lies they teach in the east and the treachierous figures of spotlight of the west. there demise will come to an end one day and on that day they will realise that they have a case of sole death.
Agree or Disagree:
3 
1
beau milos
3:06 am
Jan 23, 2013
mr brown should live in the middle east as a peasant muslim and see how there god has blessed them and then compare the blessed Israel and the judoe-christian west way of living. the muslim evan say how can it be that the west is so blessed, it must be because of the devil. read Joel Richardson, the mid-east beast and you will see how upside down islam is. with all the terrifying footages that i have seen its anarchy, murderous anarchy. remember what ever israel touchers become blessed and islam is trying to take that away from the west, remove our GOD given blessihgs turn our land and society into a desert and full of demons on rampage. thats what i see in the mid-east…man could i go on.!
Agree or Disagree:
3 
1
PermReader
3:40 pm
Jan 28, 2013
The History repeats itself. Before the WW2 the Western world talked about the Jewish thread while the Jews where persecuted in majority of the European countries.These countries where the nazi Germany sympathisers.So the victimes and the predatores where confused.Today`s dodgy Europeans play the same game of confusing Jews and Muslims awaiting the friendship with the winner.
Agree or Disagree:
2 
1
Alison Weston
7:53 am
Feb 06, 2013
Stormin Norman – just love your comments, they do my soul good.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Stormin'Norm
12:35 am
Feb 08, 2013
Thanks Alison…I like you toooo!!!
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
Sean Doyle
6:06 pm
Feb 22, 2013
Well said Vincent Browne. The Zionists are panicked that the truth is getting out and that the anti semitic smear has lost its potency. Unlike the cowardly apologists in America Vincent will not be apologizing. We Irish know something of oppression ourselves. Start with the Penal Laws if you’re interested.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
1
m
7:41 pm
Feb 22, 2013
Hey sean, u Irish leftists r impotent and irrelevant. Before u call me sour grapes I should tell you that I have IRISH RELATIVES, so spare me.
If u know anything of oppression then u should realize the oppression the Jewish ppl have gone through over the millennia (including in Ireland) at the hands of the IRISH.
Now they have their ancestral homeland back, no longer dhimmis nor is their destiny in the hands of anyone else. That twat browne should also realize that.
PS Zionists, of which I am one, do not panic. Zionism by definition empowers us … LOL.
The “apologist cowards” u refer to in America are islamic pandering dhimmis.
Slan!
Agree or Disagree:
1 
1
m
12:37 am
Feb 23, 2013
Shalom sean
Have you seen this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=83lGll047wY
PS Du drayt sich arum vie a fortz in russel mit ayer shlekte shprakh. Es kak, shtarb, un gei in drerd.
A gutn tog ….
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
m
6:02 pm
Feb 24, 2013
Um sean, do you spell your name “salim”?
Agree or Disagree:
0 
0
emes
3:46 pm
Feb 24, 2013
Sean, there’s always one Irish joke that has lost its flavour and that is Vincent Browne. Unfortunately, there is always that hanger-on, that groupie, that die-hard who still believes there will be an audience for his idol so he can become orgasmic in his believes of this person who’s every utterance is sheer idiotic and bloody insulting – no matter how much Sean searches for the pearls of wisdom in Browne’s vomit, he cannot deny that the Irish life of stupidity in its two-sided coin of hypocracy, will be lost beneath thousands of year of Israeli membership.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
batya dagan
6:36 pm
Feb 24, 2013
You are the cancer mister loud mouth.You have no idea what you are talking about.What comes out of your mouth are not words but bullets.You are evil, Hitler would have been proud of you.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
Human
11:29 am
Feb 25, 2013
The amount of anti-Muslim comments on this site is disturbing. In addition the comments about how the Palestinians were treated when Israel was formed show complete bias and a gross distortion of history. The continued oppression of these people is akin to to oppression suffered by my people in Apartheid South Africa. By de-humanizing these people and using racist and religious prejudices is an absolute disgrace. I pray that there will be freedom and justice for these people who have suffered for long enough. In South Africa we were terrorists when we fought for liberation and we became freedom-fighters and heroes once we over-threw our oppressors. Today the palestinians are terrorists. Tomorrow they will be heroes who fought for their dignity and rights as Human Beings.
Agree or Disagree:
0 
2
m
5:48 pm
Feb 25, 2013
Human, I suggest you dig your head our of your arse and look at reality. Making a comparison between SA Apartheid and anything Israeli is not only an oxymoron but a huge lie. If the Jews were racist then why do they allow ANYBODY of ANY colour and ANY religion INCLUDING arabs and muslims, l live freely in Israel.
I also suggest that you should look at t his vid which explains why Israel is not an apartheid state, and it is told directly from the lips of a BLACK SOUTH AFRICAN.
I doubt you are South African let alone a black one and I find it disrespectful to use the plight of black SA’s in your obvious agenda of hate towards Israel.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
m
5:49 pm
Feb 25, 2013
Human, now for that vid. Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=se5xTh8uwyo
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0
emes
1:56 pm
Feb 25, 2013
Human, unfortunately, your long-term suffering during the Apartheid of South Africa was, as you say a disgrace, and I sympathise wholeheartedly with your oppressive period in recent history but may I say you have very little knowledge of the middle east situation when you seem to favour the Muslim sector over the Major Long Term sufferings of the Jewish peoples. You are batting for the very people who pray for your demise, in that they wish to take over and control the whole world’s regions, populous and ultimately turn it into the fanatical waste product which is their only profession. Before you start to condemn, read a book “History of the Jews,” it may put things into perspective.
Agree or Disagree:
1 
0