Featured
The Times Misplaces Judaism’s Holiest Site
The Times of London incorrectly refers to the Western Wall as Judaism’s holiest site.
Simon Plosker
January 26, 2016
Menu
The Times of London incorrectly refers to the Western Wall as Judaism’s holiest site.
As of this writing, it has been several hours since Shlomit Krigman, a 24 year old Israeli woman, was murdered by Palestinian terrorists. The headlines in the Guardian and New York Times remain unchanged.
Writing in The Algemeiner, HonestReporting’s Simon Plosker says that publisher Amos Schocken’s opinion piece sadly acknowledges that Haaretz is an accomplice to the demonization of Israel.
In other words, Hadid sat down with the people being evicted and wrote up their stories without making the effort to check them against other evidence.
Whomever was in charge of the headline should have made clear that the Palestinian girl not only HAD a knife, but she was killed while attempting to USE the knife
The Fading Two State Solution is a New York Times editorial that makes the observation that “even truth telling can ignite a firestorm.” Quite a claim considering the lack of truth-telling in the editorial itself.
NPR publishes an image where Israel has been replaced by “Palestine.” But is this an intentional snub or a politically incorrect map of the Muslim world?
When it comes to covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, ignorance apparently is bliss. Misconceptions about what goes on here plague the international media.
The Times of London’s Greg Carlstrom ignores the Palestinian terrorist murder of Dafna Meir in favor of a story on Israeli price fixing of school trips to Poland.
Two Palestinian stabbing attacks on Israeli women are described as “exchanges of violence” in the New York Times’ headline.
The brutal stabbing of Israeli mother Dafna Meir, in her home in Otniel, fails to generate much media coverage. Just how bloodthirsty does a Palestinian terror attack against Israelis have to be to deserve coverage?
The International Business Times inaccurately states that Hamas took over Gaza through democratic means and states the Hamas capture of an Israeli spy dolphin as fact.
Why does CNN think it’s appropriate to include a politicized Palestinian museum in its feature on cultural attractions opening in 2016?
The Independent wrongly states that the Green Line, agreed in the 1949 armistice, was the line “between Israel and Palestine.”
A Guardian opinion piece implies that Israeli Jews are spreading racist hatred having failed to learn the lessons of Nazism and Mein Kampf.
The New York Times bends over backwards to avoid using the term “terrorism.” They do make one exception however.
The hatred of Israel by the people interviewed should have been included so it would be clear their liberal views end in terms of peace with Israel.
Why would a journalist leave out 90% of what a source said? Maybe she wanted readers to have a certain impression that might not reflect the reality?
HonestReporting is a USA non-profit 501(c)(3) charitable organization as recognized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Tax ID# 06-1611859. Your generous tax-deductible donations make a real difference.
© 2024 All Rights Reserved to HonestReporting
