Human Rights Watch (HRW) claimed last week in its latest World Report that Israel was a repressive regime, and called on the world’s democratic leaders to stop supporting the Jewish state. Israel – the only democratic country in the Middle East – was grouped by the controversial rights group into the same cadre of serial human rights violators as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Hungary, Turkey, and the Czech Republic.
Within a matter of hours, major outlets such as France24, the Independent, and the Daily Mail had uncritically reproduced these claims from articles that first appeared in the AP, AFP, and Reuters.
Meanwhile, HRW’s urging of Western-style democracies to cut aid to autocratic rulers and Israel did not extend to the West Bank’s Palestinian Authority, despite the PA’s long record of political corruption and cracking down on internal dissent. Seemingly, Human Rights Watch has no qualms with Ramallah receiving copious amounts of aid from the US and Europe (see here, here, here, and here) to continue its repression of the Palestinian people.
Join the fight for Israel’s fair coverage in the news
A deeper look into the report’s claims shows that the HRW’s doubting of the legitimacy of Israel’s democratic institutions, as well as the call for Western countries to suspend support for the Jewish state and its failure to criticize Palestinian oppression, reveals the organization’s chronic anti-Israel bias.
Fact Check, HRW: Israel’s Democracy is Strong, Vibrant, Imperfect
Executive director of HRW Kenneth Roth depicts the Jewish state as having an ailing democracy by associating it with autocratic countries and minimizing its political freedoms. Directly before referring to Israel, Roth writes: “In certain countries where some degree of political pluralism was still tolerated, broad coalitions of political parties have begun to form, spanning the political spectrum.” (Emphasis added)
However, sandwiched between mentions of opposition groups forming against incumbents in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Turkey – all of which are struggling under controversial leaders – Roth implies that the same dynamics were evidenced in Israel, where “a broad coalition ended the long-time rule of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.”
No further explanation is given for this specious association and neither HRW nor the outlets that provided a platform for its claims sought to provide context.
Related Reading: Israel’s Imperfect Democracy Alive & Vibrant – Countering The New York Times’ ‘Demise’ Misdiagnosis
In fact, Netanyahu’s tenure as premier ended as a result of a functional Israeli democracy. Indeed, the same legal and political processes that enabled Netanyahu’s rise to power also facilitated his political demise.
Even though Netanyahu’s ouster came after four elections, it is a testament to the vigor of Israeli democracy that these elections were carried to completion; that each election resulted in the reorganization of power in Israel’s parliament; and that Jerusalem is currently run by the most ideologically diverse political coalition in the Jewish state’s history that includes prominent Arab representatives.
Israeli democracy continues to rank high by global standards. Freedom House in 2019 gave the country 13 out of 16 points for ‘political pluralism and participation,’ showing that Israelis count on much more than what Roth described as “some degree of political pluralism.” Furthermore, Israel received a perfect score for ‘electoral process,’ and 10 out of 12 points for a ‘functioning of government.’
HRW Skirts Growing Evidence of PA Authoritarianism
In stark contrast, Mahmoud Abbas is currently serving the 17th year of his first four-year term as the president of the Palestinian Authority. Since then, elections in the West Bank were announced and subsequently canceled in 2009, 2011, 2018, and 2019.
Currently, the only viable electoral alternative in the West Bank to the ruling Fatah party is Hamas, designated by the US and Israel as a terrorist organization. No other political contender exists.
Yet out of the 1,133 words devoted in HRW’s report to outlining the state of human rights in the West Bank, only 176 words addressed the Palestinian Authority. The study correctly states that the PA has “detained activists on manifestly political charges, like insulting ‘higher authorities’ and creating ‘sectarian strife,’ that in effect criminalized peaceful dissent.” It also notes that “PA personal status laws discriminated against women, including in relation to marriage, divorce, custody of children and inheritance.”
Related Reading: Washington Post Doesn’t Find Harassment of Its Own Journalists by Palestinian Authority Newsworthy
And that’s it. HRW is curiously silent on the details of Ramallah’s crackdown against ordinary Palestinians. Indeed, what the report fails to note is that “criminalization of peaceful dissent” is characterized by brutal PA raids, smear campaigns against anti-corruption activists, arrests and harassment of members of the Palestinian and international press, and the incitement to violence against its own people as well as Israelis (see here, and here).
Yet neither HRW or the international press have called for the US or the other Western countries that back the PA’s government to reconsider their support in light of this unambiguous autocracy.
US and European Support for Israel is Crucial to Regional Security
In an article, titled HRW: Democracy must step up as autocrats face turning point, the Associated Press notes that:
“[Roth] faulted President Joe Biden’s administration for promising a US foreign policy led by human rights but then continuing ‘to sell arms to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Israel despite their persistent repression.’”
Roth, AP, and the other agencies that published this excerpt completely ignored Washington and other Western-style democracies’ vested interest in Mideast security. What Roth fails to note is that American support of Saudi Arabia and Egypt is indispensable in the fight against extremism in the Middle East, specifically against the Iranian proxy militias that since 2014 have plunged Yemen into a bitter war.
Instead, a sovereign nation’s right, obligation, in fact, to defend its citizens from a government committed to its destruction is simply overlooked (see here, here, and here). AP’s agenda-driven reporting thus sets up a false dichotomy – between human rights and the Jewish state’s fundamental right to survive.
Such support is also crucial in combatting threats emanating from Lebanon’s Hezbollah terrorist group, another Iranian proxy that routinely threatens to destroy Israel. Another beneficiary of Iranian largesse is the Gaza Strip’s Hamas rulers, which also vows on a regular basis to eradicate Israel and launched thousands of rockets last year in its latest attempt to accomplish this goal.
The Iranian issue has become even more crucial to regional peace, with Tehran accelerating its nuclear weapons program following former-US President Donald Trump’s withdrawal in 2018 from the Iran Nuclear Deal. In recent months, the Islamic Republic has openly threatened to bomb Israeli cities, including where the Jewish state’s alleged nuclear plant is located.
Related: ‘The Squad’ & Congress’ Iron Dome Fiasco Is Bigger Than You Think. Here’s Why. (VIDEO)
Yet while Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas frequently voice their desire to wipe Israel off the map, HRW sees it fit to lobby the world’s democracies to effectively strangle the region’s only viable democracy.
Memo to Media: HRW History Shows It’s Anything But Objective
For the media’s part, major news organizations uncritically accepted and perpetuated HRW’s alternate version of reality. These outlets continue to spread the slanted conclusions of HRW as if the organization were an objective source.
HRW’s blatantly anti-Israel agenda became clear as early as 2011 with the retraction of the fraudulent Goldstone Report that was produced with the organization’s support. The report falsely alleged that Israel was guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Most recently, HRW has taken on the mission of arguing, against all available evidence, that Israel is guilty of the crime of apartheid.
But even as HRW has continued to publish unsubstantiated claims against Israel, major media outlets have carried on printing the opinions of the controversial organization as if its reputation is above reproach.
Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.
New! Skip the social scroll and get the latest from HonestReporting via Telegram.
