Death of a Baby
It was a tragic casualty of war. But using it as an anti-Israel diatribe is gratuitous exploitation, and a gross lack of context.
ManagingTeam
May 8, 2001
Menu
It was a tragic casualty of war. But using it as an anti-Israel diatribe is gratuitous exploitation, and a gross lack of context.
For more than two decades, journalist Robert Fisk has used his correspondent card to proudly become a crusader for Arab and Palestinian causes.
A thorn in the side of Israel since the violence began, CNN continues to claim to be objective and unbiased. But does CNN really believe such a thing?
Martin Peretz, editor-in-chief and chairman of The New Republic, has consistently stood by Israel's side, exposing the Arab rhetoric commonly parroted in the Western media.
When Israel strikes in retaliation, CNN mentions the original Palestinian attack as a yawning afterthought.
A reporter in Denver has earned his placed as one of the most rabidly anti-Israel journalists at work today. It's time to let him know how we feel.
After months of criticizing the BBC and the Guardian for so much negativity coming out of the British media, here's a piece of good news for a change.
As Israel lays to rest the victim of Palestinian infanticide, the media tries to downplay the tragedy by comparing it to other casualties of Mideast violence.
Does shooting babies and blowing up teenagers classify as
HonestReporting objected to the Washington Post's down-playing of infanticide. The Post tries to shift the blame.
Reporting a murder in the passive form changes the meaning entirely. Someone at The Washington Post tried to pull a fast one.
Israel's partner in peace, and America's strongest Arab ally, is flaming the fans of hatred in its government-backed media.
In a classic case of imbalanced reporting, media reports pour in about the blockade of Palestinian towns — but nothing about the blockade imposed on Israelis.
The New York Times singles out Israeli settlers as a separate class of people. By doing so, it strengthens the hand of Palestinians perpetrating attacks.
When HonestReporting questioned the use of the terms "terrorists" and "militants," the BBC admitted to applying an arbitrary double-standard.
When a Western target is hit, it's the work of "terrorists." When an Israeli target is hit, it's the work of "militants." Why?
Two notorious anti-Israel reporters gang up to cover the same piece of propaganda – and use nearly identical language in the process.
When the British Guardian responds in less-than-honorable fashion, the director of HonestReporting gives them a calm, rational lashing.
HonestReporting is a USA non-profit 501(c)(3) charitable organization as recognized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Tax ID# 06-1611859. Your generous tax-deductible donations make a real difference.
© 2024 All Rights Reserved to HonestReporting
