fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Sharansky on the Dura Video

Natan Sharansky weighs in on why the Muhammed Dura video and the appeal of Philippe Karsenty both matter: It is important to note that the al-Dura news report profoundly influenced Western public opinion. When I…

Reading time: 2 minutes

SharanskyNatan Sharansky weighs in on why the Muhammed Dura video and the appeal of Philippe Karsenty both matter:

It is important to note that the al-Dura news report profoundly influenced Western public opinion. When I served in the Israeli government as minister of Diaspora Affairs from 2003 to 2005, I traveled frequently to North American college campuses. I heard first hand how Mohammed al-Dura had shaped the perceptions of young people just beginning to follow events in the Middle East. For many Jewish students, the incident was a stain of dishonor that called into question their support for Israel. For anti-Israel students, the story reaffirmed their sense of Zionism’s innately “racist” nature and became a tool for recruiting campus peers to the cause. . . .

Tragically, there is no way to repair the damage inflicted on Israel’s international image by the France 2 report, much less restore the Israeli and Jewish victims whose lives were exacted as vengeance. It is possible, however, to deter slanderous news reporting – and the violence that often accompanies it – by setting a precedent for media accountability via the handover of Talal Abu Rahmeh’s full 27 minutes of raw footage.

Related reading: Storm Clouds Over Paris

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content