fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Empowering Encampments: NYT Article Sugarcoats Campus Antisemitism

Summer is not over yet, but somehow the New York Times can’t remember what truly happened on college campuses this past spring.  On Sunday, the New York Times reported that many charges against college campus…

Reading time: 3 minutes

Summer is not over yet, but somehow the New York Times can’t remember what truly happened on college campuses this past spring. 

On Sunday, the New York Times reported that many charges against college campus protestors have been dropped. The article minimizes the causes of the arrests, actively dismissing the underlying violence and antisemitism at the recent demonstrations.

The article terms the encampments as “pro-Palestinian,” neglecting to acknowledge the pro-terror sentiment that was often present. Students at Stanford protests were seen wearing green headbands with Hamas symbols. At Princeton, Hezbollah flags were waved at a “Gaza solidarity encampment”. Across the country, protestors chanted “Globalize the Intifada” — an international call for targeted terror attacks and violence against Israelis and Jews. 

By ignoring these facts, the Times is complicit in downplaying the dangerous antisemitic and anti-Zionist ideologies that were present. 

The article first quotes Delia Garza, a prosecutor who dropped charges against more than 100 students arrested at the University of Texas at Austin. She claimed the arrests were for “minor and non-violent offenses,” and that “students protesting on their own campus were simply exercising First Amendment rights.”

In reality, these protests were laden with hateful antisemitic speech and rhetoric. These were not peaceful expressions of free speech but aggressive campaigns to instill fear and hatred in Jewish students. 

At UCLA, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) erected a deeply antisemitic papier-mâché caricature of a pig holding a bag of money in front of an Israeli flag to protest a Board of Regents meeting.

Related Video: Inside the Anti-Jewish Hate Protests on Ivy League Campuses

At UMass Amherst, a Jewish student was punched and spat on by another student for waving an Israeli flag. 

At Florida International University, protestors prevented Jewish students from attending Shabbat services as they stood outside the FIU Hillel building. 

In many cases, Jewish students were blocked from entering certain areas of campus, libraries, and even classrooms. This is the harassment and intimidation that was seen across dozens of campuses in America. 

Once again, The Times has failed in its journalistic duty to portray a full and accurate picture of events. In an entire discussion of the campus protest arrests, it does not make a single mention of the extreme antisemitism present at these demonstrations. 

Garza’s sentiment that student protesters were simply exercising free speech trivializes their actions and enforces the idea that they do not deserve any consequences for their actions. 

Hermann Walz, a defense lawyer in Austin, TX and former prosecutor, claims in the article that “the goal [of these arrests] isn’t to punish people. It’s to clear the streets.” This dangerous statement absolves the protesters of any wrongdoing. It implies that their actions were merely an issue of occupying space on campus, when in reality, the problem is much more significant. 

The New York Times’ selective memory of spring’s campus unrest sends a dangerous message: that hate-fueled actions against Jews and Zionists are excused and forgotten. 

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.

Image Credits: Columbia University protest: Melissa Bender via Reuters, Protesters blocking the traffic: Olga Fedorova / SOPA Images/Sipa USA via Reuters

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content