fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Even If You Will It, It Still Remains A Dream: New York Times, There Is No ‘Palestine’

The New York Times once again is playing fast and loose with facts pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On September 27, the outlet republished an August 23 crossword puzzle that included a “clue” referencing the…

Reading time: 5 minutes

The New York Times once again is playing fast and loose with facts pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On September 27, the outlet republished an August 23 crossword puzzle that included a “clue” referencing the “Largest city in the Palestinian state.”

On October 1, in an ostensibly apolitical piece titled, The Artists Bringing Activism Into and Beyond Gallery Spaces, The New York Times Style Magazine included this quote:

Both groups have also stoked controversy among their ideological opponents, most recently pro-Israel activists, who have said their support of Palestine has helped contribute to antisemitic violence…”

NYT fact-checkers on extended hiatus trying to locate ‘Palestine’?

Following publication of the original crossword as well as the headline below on August 30, HonestReporting took action.

In Fact-checking The New York Times: There Is No Palestinian State, we detailed that, according to the United Nations, the current status of ‘Palestine’ is the same as that of the Holy See (Vatican), which is clearly not an independent country.

We also noted that there is a clear path to Palestinian statehood.

The Oslo Accords forged in 1993 between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization led to the creation of the Palestinian Authority the following year. The agreement was based on a promise by the Palestinian leadership to renounce terrorism and resolve all outstanding issues with Israel via bilateral negotiations.

To date, the Palestinian leadership has failed to live up to its obligations.

HonestReporting urged readers to contact the NYT to weigh in on these clear cases of media inaccuracy:

We followed this up with a September 9 email to The New York Times fact-checking team that, as of publication of this piece, has gone without response.

NYT: Agenda-driven fact-checking?

Conjuring up a country — ‘Palestine’ — that does not exist according to international law — and never has — is not a one-off aberration. For example, in the items below NYT reporters and analysts depicted the existence of a Palestinian state as fact. And all of the pieces, with the exception of the first, were published in May, when for 11 days US-designated Palestinian terrorist groups based in the Gaza Strip fired nearly 4,500 of rockets towards Israeli population centers.

NYT: Checking facts…selectively

The New York Times has a major responsibility to get the facts right on a topic as complex and nuanced as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Moreover, the publication has shown that it is highly capable of acting quickly on other stories it has deemed fit to investigate:

Indeed, The New York Times places so much value on fact-checking that this ability seems to be one of the key criteria for joining the paper:

The New York Times is expanding its newsletter portfolio and seeks an experienced fact-checker to join the team. Candidates should have an eye for precision and be comfortable working in a fast-paced news environment. We’re looking for exceptional news judgment and an investigator’s mind. And while we value deliberate, careful checking, speed is also important. The fact checker will be part of a small group of writers and editors, so a collaborative spirit is a must. An entrepreneurial mind-set is a plus.”
Join the fight for Israel’s fair coverage in the news
When you sign up for email updates from HonestReporting, you will receive
Sign up for our Newsletter:

Whoever lands the job might consider dedicating what would amount to no more than a bare minimum of time to curbing the spread by their new employer of misinformation about the name of a country that does not exist.

Otherwise, The New York Times will continue to effectively normalize unilateral Palestinian efforts to achieve statehood, even as Ramallah incites violence against the Jewish state. This, after having on numerous occasions rejected comprehensive peace offers and, perpetually, goodwill gestures by Jerusalem aimed at reviving negotiations.

Help fight for media accuracy by contacting Linda Qiu, The New York Times Fact Checker by Twitter at @YLindaQiu; or by sending an email to [email protected]. You can also contact @NYTimesPR

Learned something new here? Please take a moment to share this article on social media and follow the Israel In Focus page on Facebook to read more articles explaining Israel’s history, politics, and international affairs. Click here to learn more!

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content