On Sunday, August 3, major media outlets amplified a distorted Palestinian narrative about Jerusalem’s Temple Mount — Judaism’s holiest site — in a way that did more than just misinform. It helped legitimize the very rhetoric used by Hamas to justify its October 7, 2023 massacre.
From factual errors to sensationalism, the coverage of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s brief visit to the Al-Aqsa compound on Tisha B’Av – the Jewish day of mourning for the destruction of the ancient Temples – was painted as a dangerous provocation, a spark threatening to ignite further regional instability.
This is more than bad reporting. It’s complicity in a lie that kills.
While Jewish prayer at the site – the third holiest for Muslims – is forbidden, any outlet that paints such a non-violent act as dangerous automatically adopts the point of view of the real extremists, forgetting that such coverage fuels terrorist propaganda.
1/
Here’s @guardian claiming Israeli minister Itamar Ben-Gvir prayed at the Al-Aqsa Mosque.
He didn’t.Let’s talk about the Temple Mount, Judaism’s holiest site, which also houses Al-Aqsa, Islam’s third holiest.
A thread on media confusion – and misrepresentation. ? pic.twitter.com/8uBF6H3y1o
— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) August 4, 2025
Compound Vs. Mosque
Outlets like The Guardian and The Times of London suggested Ben Gvir had literally entered the Al-Aqsa mosque and prayed inside.
He didn’t.
He visited the broader Temple Mount compound, which includes the mosque, but also happens to be the site of the First and Second Jewish Temples. He said a short, silent prayer to mark the day Jews mourn the destruction of those temples. That’s it.
The International Business Times even suggested that the Al-Aqsa Mosque itself is sacred to Jews – a basic factual error that betrays either ignorance or ideological bias. Neither reflects well on a journalist.
Meanwhile, The Los Angeles Times and The Associated Press left out any context about the significance of the day for Jews, and instead used the opportunity to link Ben-Gvir’s visit to unrelated violence in Gaza.
The BBC avoided using the Hebrew term “Har HaBayit” (Temple Mount) altogether, referring to it only by the Arabic “Haram al-Sharif,” as though the Jewish connection to the site is some kind of fringe claim.
Related Reading: ‘Al-Aqsa Is in Danger’: The Anatomy of a Lie
Fueling the Flames
Such coverage – whether through carelessness or design – frames Jews as the problem. And that’s exactly the kind of narrative that fuels genocidal violence, like the one launched on October 7, 2023.
As Hamas itself stated after slaughtering 1,200 Israelis and kidnapping hundreds into Gaza, operation “Al-Aqsa Flood” was a legitimate response against “the Israeli judaization plans of the blessed al-Aqsa Mosque” and “the intensification of the Israeli settlers’ incursions into the holy Mosque.”
By repeating this framing – that a Jew praying at his holiest site is a threat to Muslims – the media feed the propaganda machine that fuels antisemitic violence.
Let’s be clear: any outlet that claims Jewish prayer sparked “outrage” or “anger” is not reporting – it’s siding with the murderers. Men too fragile to hear Hebrew on the Temple Mount, yet brutal enough to slit Jewish throats.
Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region. Get updates direct to your phone. Join our WhatsApp and Telegram channels!
© Divuach Ne’eman R”A, 2025
