More Palestinian terror attacks mean more screwy headlines. Context and accuracy took a hit.
Without question, today’s worst headline was served up by the Irish Times.
For readers who initially wrote us about this screwy Associated Press header (cached version), the wire service subsequently updated the headline.
Most papers around the world updated their AP wire copy accordingly.
Unfortunately, the Philadelphia Inquirer decided there was no room for context.
Then there was this unfortunate headline in Australia’s News.com.au. I’m not clear whether to blame the web site or the Australian Associated Press, which is independent of AP.
There was a doubt BBC News and Newsweek that Palestinians even initiated the attacks. Both headlines are willing to accept Israeli confirmation that the Palestinians were killed, but not the reason for it. Hence the quote marks.
Last, but not least, there’s headline/subhead combination at The Guardian. The fact that Palestinians initiated the attack is “alleged” while the words “though no soldiers were hurt” implies Israeli security forces didn’t really need to defend themselves. Which raises the question: Is self-defense only legitimate if Israelis are injured first?
If you spot other headline fails, you can send us your tips through our Red Alert Page.
Before you comment on this article, please remind yourself of our Comments Policy. Any comments deemed to be in breach of the policy will be removed at the editor’s discretion.
© Divuach Ne’eman R”A, 2025
