Rapper Macklemore has been removed from the rest of Ed Sheeran’s stadium tour after Robert Kraft and several venues told the tour promoter that they would not allow him to perform.
Here are some of the mainstream media headlines we are seeing regarding the story:
The implication is clear: Robert Kraft acted because of Macklemore’s “Palestine” advocacy.
While Macklemore himself has made it about this issue and this issue alone, Robert Kraft’s own statement sheds light on the actual reason:
“Based on Macklemore’s recent actions, material shared from the stage during Ed Sheeran’s shows in New Jersey, and a broader history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery that we believe has been deeply offensive and hurtful to the Jewish community, we determined that his participation in the September 25th and 26th concerts at Gillette Stadium would cross that line.”
In other words, Macklemore’s “Free Palestine” chants were only part of the issue, and they need to be viewed in light of what Kraft calls “his history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery” – something we have dealt with before.
But Kraft didn’t stop there. Later in the same statement, he addressed the “free speech” framing directly:
“This decision is not about diminishing the suffering of innocent Palestinians or denying anyone the right to advocate on their behalf. Their pain and loss are real. But that advocacy should not come at the expense of the Jewish community.” He added that “standing with the Palestinian people and standing against Hamas, antisemitism and hate should not be mutually exclusive.”
In other words, advocating for Palestinians is not by itself an issue. It becomes a problem when accompanied by antisemitism and a complete negation of what Israelis and Jews have endured, especially from October 7 onwards.
While the outlets above eventually mention Kraft’s concerns about Macklemore’s history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery, that crucial context is buried deep in their reports and, for the most part, left unexplained.
And that matters. Because there is a considerable difference between being removed from a concert for merely advocating for Palestinians and being removed because the venue owner believes your conduct forms part of a broader pattern of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery.
By reducing the story to “Macklemore barred over Palestine,” the headlines effectively adopt Macklemore’s framing of what happened while relegating Kraft’s actual explanation to the small print.
Macklemore wants this to be a story about silencing pro-Palestinian advocacy. The media shouldn’t be helping him make it one.
Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region. Get updates direct to your phone. Join our WhatsApp and Telegram channels!
© Divuach Ne’eman R”A, 2025
