fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

What They Also Got Wrong: Examining The New York Times’ Coverage of Israel

The New York Times opinion section recently published a collection of eight pieces from different columnists entitled, ‘I Was Wrong.’ The publication’s description of this group of articles, published on July 21, explained that NYT…

Reading time: 7 minutes

The New York Times opinion section recently published a collection of eight pieces from different columnists entitled, ‘I Was Wrong.’ The publication’s description of this group of articles, published on July 21, explained that NYT contributors “hold on to the idea that good-faith intellectual debate is possible, that we should all be able to rethink our positions on issues, from the most serious to the most trivial.”

The newspaper further stated that the writers of these articles “can be models of how valuable it can be to admit when you get things wrong.”

This seemed a perfect opportunity for the Times to admit its perpetual bias against Israel, and correct factually inaccurate reporting on the Arab-Israeli conflict, which has led to its ten million subscribers often being misinformed about the Jewish state.

Unfortunately – and surprisingly for a newspaper that covers the Jewish State as if it is local news – the ‘I Was Wrong‘ series did not mention Israel at all, not even in passing. HonestReporting zoomed in on five key instances in which The New York Times and its journalists have faltered in accurately covering Israel.

Join the fight for Israel’s fair coverage in the news
When you sign up for email updates from HonestReporting, you will receive
Sign up for our Newsletter:

1. Michelle Goldberg Downplays BDS’ Anti-Jewish Hatred

Michelle Goldberg used her ‘I Was Wrong‘ article to reevaluate her 2017 coverage of Al Franken. However, she seemingly stands by her favorable portrayal of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement in her 2019 op-ed, Anti-Zionists Deserve Free Speech.’

After detailing some of the pushback the controversial movement had received in certain states and on certain campuses, Goldberg naively wrote “What are pro-Israel forces afraid of? The BDS movement doesn’t engage in or promote violence. Its leaders make an effort to separate anti-Zionism from antisemitism.”

No, Goldberg was not being sarcastic. Perhaps she just chose to omit the fact that the movement’s West Bank-based National Committee counts as a member the Council of National and Islamist Forces in Palestine, composed of member groups such as Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, all of which are widely classified as terrorist organizations.

She also left out that BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti has stated that “we [BDS] oppose a Jewish state in any part of [British Mandate] Palestine.”

Certainly, that does not sound like a movement solely intent on putting economic pressure on the Israeli government to change its policies. Rather, it is clearly a call to dismantle the world’s only Jewish state.

So much for “an effort to separate anti-Zionism from antisemitism.”

Ironically, during last year’s Hamas-initiated war between the Israel Defense Forces and Gaza-based terror groups, Goldberg wrote another op-ed entitled The Crisis of Anti-Semitic Violence, which documented the heightened violence experienced by Jews worldwide during that time frame.

Perhaps, if she is really concerned about anti-Jewish hatred, Goldberg should rethink her fawning writing on Israel and the BDS movement.

Related Reading: New York Times Columnist: BDS Distances Itself From Antisemitism

2. NYT Disregards Core Tenets of Objective Journalism During 2021 Gaza Conflict

Last year’s 11-day conflict with terror groups in the Gaza Strip was a serious and complex escalation that called for responsible reporting and journalistic integrity.

The Times, however, decided to move in the opposite direction when it published They Were Only Children,’ a photo slideshow of Palestinian and Israeli children killed during the fighting.

Indeed, no crucial context surrounding the cause of the conflict and the forces at play was provided — including the pertinent fact that Israeli strikes were in response to rocket attacks from Hamas, a US-designated terrorist organization that uses innocent Palestinian children as human shields and whose charter calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people.

Additionally, the NYT failed to acknowledge that at least nine of the Palestinian victims in the slideshow were killed by failed rocket launches from Gaza, while it published a commonly used stock photo of a Palestinian girl and framed it as another victim of the conflict, even though the image of the same girl had been used in the past to accuse Israel of killing children.

The photo of the fake victim circulated countless times to the publication’s massive readership before being taken down.

Finally, one of the “children” shown on the slideshow was Khaled Qanou, a seventeen-year-old member of a terror group called the Mujahideen Brigades.

Overall, the Times engaged in overtly biased reporting riddled with inaccuracy during a pivotal and sensitive time.

3. Guest Essayist Refaat Alareer Given Platform to Spread Antisemitic Views

Although opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the views of a newspaper, who a publication decides to bring on as a guest essayist could in fact reflect the sentiments and values that the outlet is choosing to give a voice.

With the 2021 Gaza conflict at its peak, the Times published an essay by Refaat Alareer titled, My Child Asks, ‘Can Israel Destroy Our Building if the Power is Out?'” which falsely accused the IDF of hitting targets with “no strategic value” and “drawing straws” to decide “which block to annihilate.”

Notably, the piece was included in high school lesson plans for the Times’ Learning Network.

The NYT apparently did not mind that Alareer has a history of blatant and virulent antisemitism. In October 2021, an HonestReporting expose revealed that his Twitter profile contained over 115 tweets in which he compared the Jewish state to Nazi Germany, a clear example of Judeophobia under the IHRA’s widely-adopted working definition.

Some of his online statements include “Hitler is as peaceful as any Israeli leader,” and that Zionism and Nazism “are two cheeks of the same dirty arse.”

Related Reading: New York Times Guest Essayist Refaat Alareer Compared Israel to Nazi Germany Over 100 Times

4. Times Constantly Questions Israel’s Status as a Democracy

One narrative the Times has repeatedly pushed in recent years is the idea that Israel is turning away from democracy. Countless misleading headlines, such as Did Israel Just Stop Trying to be a Democracy?’ and Israel is Falling Apart, Because the Conflict Controls Us,’ have made it seem to the uneducated reader that democracy is on the decline in Israel.

In reality, according to the data, the opposite is true. Freedom House’s Freedom in the World 2022 report gave Israel a favorable 13/16 rating for “Political Pluralism and Participation” and described the country as a “parliamentary democracy with a multiparty system and independent institutions that guarantee political rights and civil liberties for most of the population.”

Top Times columnists have even affirmed Israel’s standing as a model democracy. Veteran columnist Thomas Friedman, who has been critical of Israeli policies for decades and wrote an ‘I Was Wrong column of his own, highlighted in January what Israel’s historically diverse government coalition could teach the United States. He wrote that the coalition’s “main mission was to make the basic functions of government work again and safeguard the integrity of Israel’s democracy.”

Related Reading: Democracy in Action: Your Guide to the 2021 Israeli Elections

5. Report Illustrates New York Times’ Clear Anti-Israel Bias

When a newspaper continually pushes one side of a story, trends start to emerge. That is what Ma’ariv journalist Lilac Sigan demonstrated in her July 9th expose of the NYT’s biased coverage of Israel.

Sigan examined the opinion and world sections of the Times and found that of the 118 articles published on Israel up to that point, 53 percent actively portrayed Israel negatively. According to the Ma’ariv report, 34 percent of the pieces were neutral, and only 13 percent painted Israel in a positive light.

Moreover, Sigan found that Israel received 832 mentions — significantly more than any other country in the Middle East. Terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah were only mentioned 37 and 22 times respectively. Sigan also noted that the Times failed to report on 124 relevant stories regarding Palestinian terrorism, incitement and violence against Israelis.

If the NYT decides to publish another collection of ‘I Was Wrong‘ columns, it seems like they will have plenty of material to choose from that is related to its coverage of Israel.

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content