CNN and other media don’t report that Palestinian terrorists are killing Israelis. Only that Israelis are victims of “knife attacks” and “car attacks.” Watch the difference in the coverage of Israeli and Palestinian attacks. Image: CC BY-NC-ND flickr/Guillermo Ruiz/em>
It’s a parent’s worst nightmare. I was outside walking my dog when I got the call from my daughter.
The New York Times referred to him as a “Far-right activist.” The BBC and LA Times labeled him a “Right-wing Jewish activist.” The Sydney Morning Herald calls him a “Far-right religious activist.” Throughout the media, there is an unusual consistency with the terms being used to describe Rabbi Yehuda Glick, who was the victim of…
The occupation of the son of a columnist is more significant than the admiration of reporter for Yasser Arafat? #Double Standards at the New York Times
The New York Times published an opinion piece by Ali Jarbawi (“Palestine’s Nuclear Option“) in which he claims that Mahmoud Abbas has made numerous concessions to Israel but has gotten nothing in return. We wonder what these concessions are?
In “Remnants of War Become Art in Gaza,” AFP promotes a “feel good” human interest story. The article describes how Palestinians in Gaza are turning remnants of the military conflict into art.
The saga of the Professor who wrote that pro-Israel students were “brain dead” continues in Illinois and on the pages of the New York Times. Our video, “Steven Salaita: Free Speech or Anti Israel Hate?” demonstrates that the University of Illinois did not fire Steven Salaita because he was a critic of Israel. They rescinded…
Within weeks of the end of the Gaza conflict, the New York Times omits certain key events and uses questionable language to describe the way the conflict began.
Was Steven Salaita fired because of his views on Israel? Or did the University of Illinois draw the line at anti Israel hate and intimidation?
LA Times columnist sees Professor’s hate-speech tweet that “If you’re defending Israel right now you’re an awful human being” as legitimate academic discourse.