NY Times: E1 Won’t Divide West Bank in Two After All

December 16, 2012 15:55 by

The NY Times corrected the record on E1 construction. It’s a media precedent:

An article on Dec. 2 about Israel’s decision to move forward with planning and zoning for settlements in an area east of Jerusalem known as E1 described imprecisely the effect of such development on access to the cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem from Jerusalem, and on the West Bank. Development of E1 would limit access to Ramallah and Bethlehem, leaving narrow corridors far from the Old City and downtown Jerusalem; it would not completely cut off those cities from Jerusalem. It would also create a large block of Israeli settlements in the center of the West Bank; it would not divide the West Bank in two. And because of an editing error, the article referred incompletely to the possibility of a contiguous Palestinian state. Critics see E1 as a threat to the meaningful contiguity of such a state because it would leave some Palestinian areas connected by roads with few exits or by circuitous routes; the proposed development would not technically make a contiguous Palestinian state impossible.

Despite the hype, E1 doesn’t cut West Bank in two.

Category: Backspin Tags:, , , , ,
More in Backspin (277 of 6176 articles)
idflogo


The Times of Israel reports on a video released on the Internet showing IDF soldiers in the West Bank being ...