NY Times: E1 Won’t Divide West Bank in Two After All
December 16, 2012 15:55 by Pesach BensonThe NY Times corrected the record on E1 construction. It’s a media precedent:
An article on Dec. 2 about Israel’s decision to move forward with planning and zoning for settlements in an area east of Jerusalem known as E1 described imprecisely the effect of such development on access to the cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem from Jerusalem, and on the West Bank. Development of E1 would limit access to Ramallah and Bethlehem, leaving narrow corridors far from the Old City and downtown Jerusalem; it would not completely cut off those cities from Jerusalem. It would also create a large block of Israeli settlements in the center of the West Bank; it would not divide the West Bank in two. And because of an editing error, the article referred incompletely to the possibility of a contiguous Palestinian state. Critics see E1 as a threat to the meaningful contiguity of such a state because it would leave some Palestinian areas connected by roads with few exits or by circuitous routes; the proposed development would not technically make a contiguous Palestinian state impossible.
Despite the hype, E1 doesn’t cut West Bank in two.


Fan of Raoul Wallenberg
9:37 pm
Dec 16, 2012
I just met an ex-German. He had to FLEE from GERMANY because his KIDS WERE REPEATEDLY BEATEN UP, INJURED SEVERELY BY NEONAZIS:
he called UP THE LOCAL LANDESMINISTER, which HAD A PROGRAMME against NEONAZIS runnin, BUT THAT MINISTER WAS DOING NOTHING !!!
EVEN, the GERMAN AUTHORITIES (as with ONE MUSLIM FAMILY who got in the NY TIMES half a year ago, their FAMILY MEMBERS MURDERED by NEONAZIS [7 TURKISH GERMAN PEOPLE MURDERED BY NEONAZIS !!![) “BLAMED” THE VICTIM FAMILY.
Apparently, in GERMANY, ONE CAN NOT WALK AROUND WITH A JEWISH KIPPA.
this IS GAME OVER FOR GERMANY. those 3 strikes against neonazi-groups WERE real, but ONLY A CLEAR ruse, a DIVERSION, and BY FAR not ENOUGH !!! SCANDAL !!!
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
Fan of Raoul Wallenberg
9:41 pm
Dec 16, 2012
palis, shut UP. yea talk against that HAMAS NEONAZI.
what is MUCH more important than the over-rated mid east conflict, is the fact, that FASCISM is RISING in GERMANY and NO ONE does ANYTHING against NEONAZIS, even, when they, which they ALWAYS DO, beat up or even kill People.
I postulate and demand hereby with my own threat of TOTAL TERRORISM:
neonazis must be forbidden.
if that will not be done by the nations, I will by violence have to force them to do that.
and my violence will be MORE drastic than ALL you have EVER seen on this world.
beware. I am Irgun.
I WOULD do ALL to save israel. I would kill the rest of the world.
usa and uk didn^t come to help the jews. well, ok !!! hehe
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
Fan of Raoul Wallenberg
9:50 pm
Dec 16, 2012
SCAAAAAAAAAAAAANDAL !!!!
AAAA !!!!
I think I GOTTA “blog” it like THAT. !!!
WHAT DO YOU, my CHAVERIM we CHAVEROT, my FRIENDS, MY ALLEGIANCE, MY ARMY, THINK, THE PALIS DO EY ???
they RIOT IN ANGER !!!! haha by ITSELF that would PLEASE me.
but NOT over their sudo-”CAUSE”. oy. !!!!!
MY G”d. Some People think, cuz I dont TAWK like a DACTA, they could SMITE me with a BEHIND THEIR VERY EYES LOOK. hey hello. I will show you all. OH just wait. I WILL show WHAT A JEWISH KING IS. I EVEN TALKED TO NEBUKADNEZAR. he was … SEDUCED, TRAPPED by the ROMANS. he himself WAS nice and having GOOD ideas !!! so he WAS a roman puPPET. I wish ODUMA WOULD be MORE of a “BILDERBERG” puppet !! AAAA !!!
grrrrr
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
Fan of Raoul Wallenberg
9:58 pm
Dec 16, 2012
Foreigner, “I’m gonna win”.
I’m the NEW JEW. yea. yea.
A know good USAites. They do exist. And Iraq was really just a stupid, but understandable reaction to all this muslim terrorism and radical fanaticism. STILL. iraq was NOT a wrong war, but too many soldiers AND commanders had TOO much freedom to KILL People, because those poor good People were: MUSLIMS. well, so: BOO USA fa THAT!
but hey: I and you, we all, do NOT attribute that TO ANY and ALL aMericans, it would be RACISM, actually. ALL PATRIOTISM is ideally NOT racism, but structurally, it CAN be. like da brits who hated the french.
but antisemitism, and all racism, is something else, of COURSE, of COURSe. more evil. more heinous!
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
Fan of Raoul Wallenberg
10:06 pm
Dec 16, 2012
Of course, I do totally not HANG myself on ANTISEMITISM as an ISSUE.
the ISSUE comes TO ME ALL DA F… TIME IN TOTAL SAD REALITY.
But I want to wish you Mega My Lords Good Guys and Girls of HonestReporting dot “com” (no commerical site at all !) ALL THE BEST, and I mean that.
May Hashem make Your Site Great, which it IS already. You carry the Seeds of G”d, of Good, in Ye, Mine Lords and Lieges Sires of Honest Reporting. Would I be Israeli PM, I would getcha uhn TUP uv it ALL. yea. like FUCKIN cool, ma Dudes. YAY. if se AMERIKENS would OOONLY tshek HAU MACH I AAM AMMMERICAAAANN !!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BABY
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
Fan of Raoul Wallenberg
10:14 pm
Dec 16, 2012
” the proposed development would not technically make a contiguous Palestinian state impossible. ”
… yea. so. what. are SEY ALL CRAZY NOW. PEE OFF ALL WHO WANNA DESTROY ISRAEL.
and JERUSALEM is ISRAEL, CAPITO ??? do i CHEV to TAWK ebAUT “E 1″ now. IS THAT A HIGHWAY. yea im gonna get HIGH , yea damm RIGHT i will yea. i never took HEROINE, those CARAYZIES who also take PILLS I dont NEED PILLS i WANT TORA AND CANNABIS.
!
what E1. pfff. this IS JERUSALEM. if Arabs live there they can. where is the PROBLEM.
god, cheVRE. I would TAWK some SCHITT to you logical SHIT and SEN YOU UNDASTANDE.
pemm.
oyoyoy
DONDE VA ESTO MY PAIIIIIIS !!!! COMO FIDEL YO HABLO AHORA.
WHATSAPPENIN with MIDEAST!
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
David
3:43 pm
Dec 17, 2012
It’s time for a change of Power in Germany to THE LEFT. Schröder wasn’t good. The same as KOHL the SUCKER KOHL WAS — SchROEDER was the EXACT same. !!!
BUT: Merkel MIGHT be “better” than her whole party. — ? HALT: she WAS in the “SED”, the leading party of the old COMIIE DDR. And I heard by MORE THAN one pro-Jewish Christian, no, by many others, that she IS a COMMUNIST, — AND: THAT HER PARTY CDU (conservative rather rightwing) was THE ONLY ONE who SAID NOTHING against THE NAZIS in 1933. !!!
AND: NEONAZIS in GERMANY are GAINING POWER — AUTHORITIES DO NOTHING against ULTRAVIOLENT NEONAZIS who BEAT UP PEOPLE who are JEWISH, BLACK, or ASIANS or GAYS.
This must sTOP. I’ll do some phonecalls
Agree or Disagree:
0
1
David
3:51 pm
Dec 17, 2012
anf for the log, I called maself “Fan of Raoul Wallenberg” yesterday, and “I will kill Hamas” the day before that, and also “David – Pro-Palestine, and anti-hamas”.
Socialism yes. ‘Tis NOT any “communism”. COMMUNISM NO. CLEAR. A BIG NO-NO !
!
That’s what SOME americans SHOULD understande. !!!
and E1, Israel, you have my personal allowance, permission, even the REQUEST to build there, and evrywhere. We will let the good non-armed Palestinians through through NOR such an NARROW passage. TRUST in ISRAEL, ISRAEL will NEVER violate that trust. !!! And I am a normal private NON-DOCTOR, no studies finished, but intellctual person, and I support ALL victims, whoever they are. BAM.
Agree or Disagree:
0
0
New York Times: E1 würde Westjordanland doch nicht in zwei Hälften teilen « Medien BackSpin
8:18 pm
Dec 17, 2012
[...] HonestReporting Media BackSpin, 17. Dezember 2012 [...]
Agree or Disagree:
0
0
Frank adam
10:13 pm
Dec 20, 2012
This is a bit like shouting that Lord Haw Haw or Roger Casement should be allowed to run for the Westminster Parliament. Sinn Fein did but Countess Markiewicz and Gerry Adams at least had the consistency not to attend to swear in, nor draw the pay.
Agree or Disagree:
0
0
The Middle East Media Sampler 12/21/12 New York Times Dreams Of Israeli Peace | Blogs about Israel aggregation
7:53 pm
Dec 21, 2012
[...] of distance between Maaleh Adumim and Jordan is inimical to the viability of a Palestinian state, why doesn’t Israel’s narrowness at Netanya make Israel non-viable? Mr. Netanyahu gave th e go-ahead in retaliation for the United Nations vote [...]
Agree or Disagree:
1
0
Frank Adam
7:43 pm
Apr 21, 2013
When Arafat learnt of the Oslo project he looked at a map for “kissing points” from UN 181 and had to be dissuaded by aides that 1947 was impossible.
Israel offered rail links between Rafah-Gaza and Ashdod[-Lod] track, then track rent over Israel’s freight switch to Kiryat Gat and a new branch to Tequmia NW of Hebron.
This was/is cheap and easy because much of the British coastal railbed is there, the Ashdod -KG switch works and a new branch to Tequmia would be on easy Shephela geography. Also trains are fairly secure especially with vehicle flat wagons – but the duplicitous prevaricator refused!
A closed Ramallah-Bethlehem road between Jerusalem and E1 is also an easy project.
Agree or Disagree:
0
0