Over the years, we’ve seen plenty of cases of “lawfare,” where dubious legal cases are launched against Israelis or Israeli interests. But it’s hard to recall a lawsuit quite like this one:
A very sensitive Manhattan man is suing the New York Times for $50 million because it won’t call the Israel-Hamas war “genocide” — causing him to “cry himself to sleep” and feel “gaslit” by the paper, according to a bonkers new lawsuit.
The blubbering Big Apple resident Timothy Murphy is seeing red over the Gray Lady’s coverage of the war in Gaza, which he claims is “hoodwinking” readers by covering up “Israel’s genocide.”
Murphy insists that a leaked internal memo instructing editorial staff to restrict use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” when reporting on the conflict promotes anti-Palestinian “propaganda,” according to the suit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in April.
“The New York Times — in order to deceive the public about Israel’s genocide — forbade (among other words and phrases) the use of the word genocide,” the lawsuit states. “Forbidding the use of the word genocide serves no purpose other than to hide genocide.”
…
By leaving out the phrase “genocide” and allegedly hiding the “truth,” the paper made him feel depressed and crazy — and he wants big bucks in damages, according to the lawsuit.
“Plaintiff cried himself to sleep on numerous occasions and was wrought by insomnia on others. Plaintiff had compromised health through stress and a profound feeling of helplessness,” it states.
“Plaintiff had the sense of his own insanity by virtue of the gaslighting and naked hypocrisy. An obsession for truth began to grip him,” it adds. “Heightened depression and anxiety followed from The New York Times’ persistent effort to help the genocide”
Along with demanding $50 million, Murphy also demands that the paper place a warning label on top of any “censored” article about the Gaza war.
“Similar to the tobacco companies, a warning on the top of any censored article [should state] “WARNING: PROPAGANDA” or “WARNING: MISINFORMATION,” the lawsuit declares.
There’s plenty of New York Times content that deserves a warning about propaganda or misinformation. In this case, however, forgive us if we don’t shed any tears for the “blubbering Big Apple resident” pursuing this utterly ridiculous case.
Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region. Get updates direct to your phone. Join our WhatsApp and Telegram channels!
© Divuach Ne’eman R”A, 2025
