News Critiques

Billie Eilish and the Erasure of Antisemitism After Australia’s Terror Attack

On Sunday, December 14, the Australian Jewish community was shattered by a horrific terrorist attack that, at the time of…

By December 16, 2025

Key Takeaways:

  • Billie Eilish responded to the horrific antisemitic terror attack in Sydney, Australia, by calling for stricter gun laws, entirely ignoring the ideological context and motivation of the attack.
  • Australia already has some of the world’s strictest gun laws, and the perpetrators deliberately targeted a Jewish Hanukkah event.
  • When celebrities default to political talking points instead of confronting antisemitic violence head-on, they obscure the real threat and hinder meaningful accountability.

On Sunday, December 14, the Australian Jewish community was shattered by a horrific terrorist attack that, at the time of writing, has claimed the lives of 15 people, including a Holocaust survivor, a rabbi, and a 10-year-old girl.

This was not random violence. The attackers did not open fire indiscriminately on beachgoers or passersby, nor was this an abstract failure of gun control or public safety. They deliberately targeted Jews gathered for a Hanukkah event, firing toward a clearly identifiable Jewish celebration. The intent was unmistakable. This was a targeted, ideologically motivated antisemitic terror attack.

Yet some public figures rushed to reframe it as something else. Musician Billie Eilish, for example, described the attack as “devastating” while emphasizing the need for stricter gun control in the United States and Australia – a response that sidestepped both who was targeted and why.

That framing is difficult to separate from Eilish’s own record. She has publicly accused Israel of committing “genocide” and proudly worn the Artists4Ceasefire pin featuring a red hand, an image uncomfortably reminiscent of the blood-stained hands displayed by terrorists after the lynching of Israelis in Ramallah during the Second Intifada.

Australia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the world; its last mass shooting occurred in 1996. In the wake of last week’s attack, the Australian government again pledged to enforce even tighter restrictions. Whether Eilish was aware of this context is ultimately beside the point. What matters is her refusal to acknowledge the antisemitic motivation of the attack and the Jewish community it targeted.

A similar omission appeared in Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s initial statement following the attack, which made no mention of Jews as the intended victims, despite the well-known presence of a large Hanukkah event nearby. Although Albanese later corrected course, that first statement helped set the framework through which much of the public understood the attack, blurring its antisemitic nature at the outset.

This instinct to default to safe political talking points while avoiding uncomfortable truths about antisemitic violence is increasingly common among celebrities and politicians alike. But the terror attack in Australia did not occur in a vacuum. It followed more than two years of escalating antisemitic incidents across the country, during which Jews have been physically threatened, verbally abused, and spiritually targeted. Synagogues have been firebombed. Jewish-owned businesses vandalized. Crowds openly chanted calls to “gas the Jews.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by HonestReporting (@honestreporting)

Notably, some public figures did acknowledge this context. Film star Ashton Kutcher warned that antisemitic rhetoric “carries a cost.” Actor Josh Gad observed that the tragedy occurred because antisemitism has become “acceptable and cheered.” Their responses recognized a reality others chose to obscure.

Those who stripped antisemitism from their condemnation of the attack did not merely omit context; they distorted it. By refusing to name the motive, they minimize the danger facing Jewish communities and help sustain a climate in which hatred can continue unchecked.

Naming the problem is not divisive. Refusing to do so is.

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region. Get updates direct to your phone. Join our WhatsApp and Telegram channels!

© Divuach Ne’eman R”A, 2025

Sharon Levy

Sharon Levy

Born in Toronto, Sharon Levy moved to Israel in October 2023 and has held various roles in Israel advocacy and research institutions. Sharon has a Masters degree in Government with a specialization in Counterterrorism and Cyber Security from Reichman University.

Discover More

Get clear, reliable Israel news and tools to fight media bias.

Subscribe