fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Israel vs. Islamic Jihad: No Ceasefire For Skewed Reporting

A shaky ceasefire brokered on Saturday night put a stop to days of intense cross-border fighting between the Israel Defense Forces and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip, restoring relative calm after the Iran-backed terrorist organization launched over 1,400 rockets at…

Reading time: 4 minutes

shaky ceasefire brokered on Saturday night put a stop to days of intense cross-border fighting between the Israel Defense Forces and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip, restoring relative calm after the Iran-backed terrorist organization launched over 1,400 rockets at Israeli territory, with some missiles reaching as far as the Tel Aviv and Jerusalem areas.

Here’s how the press covered the days leading up to and immediately following the truce. Spoiler alert: Once again, they found a way to make Israel out to be the aggressor.

Related Reading: Israel vs. Islamic Jihad: Media Outlets Are Getting It Wrong as Terrorist Rockets Rain Down

Getting the Timeline Wrong to Turn Israel Into the Aggressor

In our initial May 11 roundup, we called out The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Voice of America and other publications for failing to provide readers with crucial context and background information. However, as Islamic Jihad expanded its firing range to the suburbs of Jerusalem over the weekend, the global media assault against Israel also expanded.

For instance, several prominent outlets, including CNNReuters, and Agence France-Presse, in their recap articles asserted that the conflict started on May 9 when the IDF announced Operation Shield and Arrow and neutralized three Islamic Jihad commanders, as well as some of their infrastructure, in defensive airstrikes across the Gaza Strip.

“The latest flare-up began on Tuesday, with the IDF launching strikes on Islamic Jihad, a Palestinian militant group it accuses [sic] of planning attacks against Israel,” CNN wrote on Sunday, in editorial copy that echoed similar accusations by the two wire services.

Yet these pieces omitted altogether that Islamic Jihad had already fired 104 projectiles the week before, following the death of one of its imprisoned senior leaders, Khader Adnan, as a result of a protracted hunger strike that saw him refuse medical treatment. Three people were wounded in Israel from the rocket fire prompting the IDF response.

A Faulty Casualty Count

Fox News likewise disregarded Islamic Jihad’s May 2 war crimes against Israeli civilians, simultaneously promoting the factually inaccurate claim that “Israeli forces killed 33 Palestinians last week in five days of fighting that followed Israel’s killing of three top members of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror group.”

In actuality, 28 Gazans are confirmed to have died in Israeli airstrikes. Among other terror operatives, the IAF took out Jihad Ghanem, a key official in Islamic Jihad’s military council, Ali Ghali, commander of the group’s rocket launching force, and Jahed Ahnam, who coordinated weapons and money transfers with Hamas. The latter earned infamy for masterminding the 2004 murder of Tali Hatuel, her unborn baby, and four daughters.

Meanwhile, four more Palestinian were likely killed when Palestinian rockets, fired from densely populated civilian neighborhoods, fell short inside the Gaza Strip. A fifth casualty, 4-year-old Tamim Daoud, reportedly suffered a heart attack caused by the stress of living through yet another Islamic Jihad-initiated military conflict.

Related Reading: Operation Breaking Dawn: Three Ways the Media Got It Wrong

Israel Ceases, The Palestinians Fire

The terms for the ceasefire with Islamic Jihad were clear: quiet would be answered with quiet. Nevertheless, within 90 minutes after the deal was reached late Saturday, Israelis again scrambled for shelter as Islamic Jihad fired several volleys of rockets into the Jewish state. Then, on Sunday night, a projectile from Gaza hit an open area near Ashkelon. But some journalists shockingly equated Israel’s restrained response with the Palestinian’s blatant breach of the ceasefire understanding.

In the most glaring example, BBC anchor Rachel Burden told viewers of the broadcaster’s Breakfast show on Sunday that “a ceasefire between Israel and Islamic Jihad militants in the Gaza Strip appears to be holding despite reports of minor breaches on both sides.” [Emphasis added]

HonestReporting’s followers on social media furthermore pointed out that the British public broadcaster seemingly attempted to mislead viewers by showing B-roll video of an Iron Dome interceptor missile being fired, directly followed by footage of a missile impact in Gaza. To be clear: Iron Dome is an air defense system, and its Tamir interceptor missiles are solely used to save lives by intercepting rockets before they can cause mass casualty events.

An Appalling Moral Equivalence

HonestReporting called out both The New York Times and Washington Post for whitewashing the reality of Islamic Jihad’s extremism.

While Reuters at least did acknowledge the terror organization’s desire to destroy Israel, it created a moral equivalence between Islamic Jihad and some members of the Israeli government.

When will the media forgive Israel for defending its citizens against unrelenting attacks by Iranian terror proxies?

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.

Featured Image: Flash 90 / Atia Mohammed / Liron Moldovan / Yossi Aloni

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content