fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Media Recast Hamas Terrorists as ‘Praying Palestinians’ in School Strike Reports

On Saturday morning, guided by intelligence from the Military Intelligence Directorate (AMAN) and Shin Bet, the Israeli Air Force executed a precision strike on a Hamas command and control center, conveniently nestled within the Al-Taabin…

Reading time: 3 minutes

On Saturday morning, guided by intelligence from the Military Intelligence Directorate (AMAN) and Shin Bet, the Israeli Air Force executed a precision strike on a Hamas command and control center, conveniently nestled within the Al-Taabin school complex near a mosque in the Dura’ Tafah area of Gaza. According to the IDF, the strike successfully eliminated at least 19 Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists, with a strong likelihood that Ashraf Juda, the commander of the Islamic Jihad’s Central Brigade, was among the casualties.

The IDF was crystal clear in its assessment: the precision munitions used were targeted at specific rooms within the men’s section of the school, where these terrorists were reportedly hiding. The rest of the complex? Largely untouched. Israel went to great lengths to minimize civilian casualties, even when dealing with a site exploited by terrorists for their own deadly purposes. After the strike, photos revealed that the damage was indeed limited to just a few rooms.

Wall Street Journal school strike
Wall Street Journal article showing scope of damage

Did the media wait to verify the facts before reporting? Unfortunately, no. Instead, they quickly amplified Hamas’ claims, accusing Israel of targeting civilians who were “praying” or “seeking refuge” inside the school, as was claimed in some reports.

For instance, The Wall Street Journal ran a headline accusing Israel of killing civilians, without providing a credible source for the alleged death toll. Reuters followed suit, reporting that “officials” claimed at least 100 people had died—though which officials these were was left unclear.

CNN and Reuters both relied on casualty figures from the “Gaza Civil Defense,” with CNN’s report quoting a spokesman who claimed Israel struck people “performing dawn prayers,” many of whom were “torn apart” and “still unidentified.” However, neither outlet clarified that Gaza’s Civil Defense is controlled by Hamas. Reuters even suggested that this Hamas-run entity has a “credible record in stating casualty numbers,” despite well-documented instances of inflated figures.

The IDF has since disputed these casualty numbers, noting the limited damage and pointing out that the figures don’t align with the precision munitions used.

However, the most outrageous reporting came from NPR, whose grotesque insinuation that Israel deliberately targets civilians was evident in its headline that stated the IDF had “struck another school, killing at least 80 people” [emphasis added].

Yes, NPR, it was “another school” that Hamas had repurposed for its operations, and another successful Israeli airstrike aimed at the terrorists who started this conflict on October 7 and continue to threaten Israel.

But it’s also another instance where the media rushed to report, without fully examining the facts, leading to yet another round of stories that uncritically echoed the narrative of a terrorist organization. Another lapse in journalistic responsibility.

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.

Photo: OMAR AL-QATTAA/AFP via Getty Images

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content