fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Peter Beinart in New York Times: Fighting Antisemitism Strengthens ‘Apartheid’ Israel

In an August 26 guest essay for The New York Times, titled ‘Has the Fight Against Antisemitism Lost Its Way?,‘ Peter Beinart ignores serious ongoing concerns about the veracity of reports by Amnesty International and Human…

Reading time: 5 minutes

In an August 26 guest essay for The New York Times, titled ‘Has the Fight Against Antisemitism Lost Its Way?,‘ Peter Beinart ignores serious ongoing concerns about the veracity of reports by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to argue that today’s battle against antisemitism has “become a threat to freedom” since many of the American Jewish leaders who are waging it have also condemned the demonization of Israel by these same organizations.

To drive home his point, Beinart lumps the Middle East’s only viable democracy with some of the world’s worst human rights violators, including China, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.

But while Peter Beinart is entitled to his bizarre opinions, he’s not entitled to his own facts. There are several points where The New York Times, as the publisher of the opinion piece, should have amended gross inaccuracies stated by Beinart about Israel.

Join the fight for Israel’s fair coverage in the news
When you sign up for email updates from HonestReporting, you will receive
Sign up for our Newsletter:

Confused Beinart: Israel’s Survival Is a ‘Conquest’

According to Beinart, American Jewish attitudes towards Israel, which at one point were more critical of the Jewish state, “…began to change after the 1967 war. Israel’s conquest of the West Bank and Gaza Strip made it master over roughly a million stateless Palestinians.”

In fact, Beinart’s “conquest” was a preemptive war of survival. In 1967, Arab armies massed on Israel’s borders with the intent to attack and destroy the Jewish state. Egypt had closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping; an act of war.

Only then did Israel launch a successful strike on Egypt, which led to an all-out war with Egypt and Syria. While Israel appealed to Jordan to not join the fighting from the east, the country nevertheless attacked, expecting a swift Arab victory.

More Beinart Confusion: Erasing Israel Is ‘Equal Citizenship’

Another linguistic sleight of hand is Beinart’s description of a parliamentary motion to erase the Jewish character of Israel as an attempt by Palestinian members of the Knesset to obtain “equal citizenship” for their constituents. Beinart doubles down on his assertion, backing it up with the thoroughly debunked findings of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch:

Most Palestinians exist as second-class citizens in Israel proper or as stateless noncitizens in the territories Israel occupied in 1967 or live beyond Israel’s borders. But under the definition of antisemitism promoted by the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the State Department, Palestinians become antisemites if they call for replacing a state that favors Jews with one that does not discriminate based on ethnicity or religion.”

With regards to Palestinian citizens, Israel is a country where Arabs serve as Supreme Court justices, fighter pilots, Members of Knesset, artists, athletes. Everything that Israelis do, Arab Israelis do.

This is because Israel’s Basic Laws and independent judiciary form the basis of a democratic state for all groups, including ethnic minorities.

So when Palestinians call for “replacing a state,” as Beinart writes, they are in reality advocating for the liquidation of a country whose legislation and court system have combatted any manifestation of discrimination — with the goal of guaranteeing equal rights for all.

Indeed, Israel is a country ranked above Italy, Spain, and the United States in a respected global index of democratic values.

Related Reading: Media’s Latest Apartheid Smear Is Israel’s ‘Two-Tiered’ Legal System in the West Bank

And even though Beinart correctly calls attention to the plight of Palestinians who live “beyond Israel’s borders,” he omits the source of their suffering.

Since the signing of the Oslo Accords in the 1990s, the vast majority of Palestinians have been governed by either the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank or Hamas — considered a terrorist group by most Western countries — in Gaza. The PA, specifically, was created with the support of the international community, with Palestinian leaders agreeing to adopt partial autonomy while granting Israel security control in some disputed areas.

But instead of choosing freedom, Ramallah is increasingly cracking down on its own people. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has been implementing measures that could turn the PA into a dictatorship, according to a new report.

What Nuclear Bomb? Beinart Ignores Iranian Threat to Middle East

Finally, Peter Beinart depicts the normalization of ties between Israel and Arab governments as evidence that the “…campaign against antisemitism is being deployed to justify not merely the violation of Palestinian human rights…American officials have begun using the struggle against antisemitism to shield those regimes.”

Yet Beinart keeps out of his piece the primary reason for the warming of ties. Israel and its regional partners have strengthened relations in response to Iranian regional threats.

In response to Iranian belligerence in both the Persian Gulf and the wider region, Israel has thus entered into a number of security arrangements with the Gulf states.

Related Reading: Abraham Accords Rippling Across Middle East With Free Trade, Technology Projects & Security Cooperation

Yes, Beinart mentions Iran in his piece — but as nothing more than just another repressive country. Yet Iran is not just any country. Its leadership continues to boast about its desire to eradicate Israel’s population of just over 9 million people. Neither does he note Tehran’s connection to Palestinian terrorist groups committed to the Jewish state’s destruction.

Even the Islamic Republic’s pursuit of nuclear weapons — especially as it pertains to Israel — is kept out of Beinart’s ‘guest essay.’

By not editing Peter Beinart’s piece more diligently, The New York Times’ own objectivity and ability to distinguish fact from anti-Israel fictional narratives is called into question.

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.

New! Skip the social scroll and get the latest from HonestReporting via Telegram.

Featured Image: Peter Beinart Picture – Joe Mabel by Commons Wikimedia

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content