fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Sharks, The Mossad and The Scotsman Make for Sexy Headlines

UPDATE 1:55 pm: See HonestReporting UK’s response to the Scotsman: Egyptian Shark Attack: Jews Not Jaws? * * * Newspapers are always treating wire articles as pulp content. It’s accepted practice for editors to trim…

Reading time: < 1 minutes

UPDATE 1:55 pm: See HonestReporting UK’s response to the Scotsman:

Egyptian Shark Attack: Jews Not Jaws?

* * *

Newspapers are always treating wire articles as pulp content. It’s accepted practice for editors to trim down stories and change headlines because of space limitations.

But once in awhile, I compare the original story with what was printed in a local paper, and wonder, Why did someone edit like this?

Case in point: Reuters, The Scotsman, and a deadly Red Sea shark attack.

Here we have an otherwise ordinary Reuters dispatch by Mohamed Zaki.

Zaki_reuters

Now see what The Scotsman did:

Zaki_scotsman

Mentioning Mossad along with sharks makes for a pretty sexy headline, but why does The Scotsman give unwarranted credibility to one official’s anti-Semitic allegation with a headline like that?

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content