The International Business Times inaccurately states that Hamas took over Gaza through democratic means and states the Hamas capture of an Israeli spy dolphin as fact.
The Independent wrongly states that the Green Line, agreed in the 1949 armistice, was the line “between Israel and Palestine.”
The New York Times bends over backwards to avoid using the term “terrorism.” They do make one exception however.
A Guardian opinion piece implies that Israeli Jews are spreading racist hatred having failed to learn the lessons of Nazism and Mein Kampf.
The hatred of Israel by the people interviewed should have been included so it would be clear their liberal views end in terms of peace with Israel.
Why would a journalist leave out 90% of what a source said? Maybe she wanted readers to have a certain impression that might not reflect the reality?
Following a Hezbollah attack, some media fail to include the context behind Israel’s control over the Shebaa Farms region on the Lebanese border.
In the face of the loud noise generated by BDS, the truth about Israel is not enough; we have to make Israel a “normal” country to uninterested people.
We had a busy year, with media critiques, news roundups, videos, graphics, social media posts, highlighting our growing community. As 2015 draws to a close, here’s a lookback at what HR readers were buzzing about. (You can follow HR on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and flickr. See also our Fighting BDS communities on Facebook and Twitter. Join the conversation!)…
Israel’s doing a very fine job of caring for its UNESCO Heritage Sites, thank you very much. There’s no reason for a Daily Telegraph slide show to include Jerusalem’s Old City in a slide show of heritage sites under threat. The Telegraph will likely defend itself by saying the under threat label follows UNESCO’s lead: the…