Big Media Confirms Foreign Jihadis Among Syrian Rebels
July 30, 2012 17:21 by Pesach BensonIsrael and the Palestinians
• White House press secretary Jay Carney refused to identify Jerusalem as Israel’s capital while sparring with reporters.
Michael Totten: Michael Totten responds from common sense:
I can understand why Carney sighed when he first heard the question and preferred not to answer. He doesn’t want Arab governments to have a conniption fit.
The problem, though, is that he is enabling delusional rejectionists. It’s always easier in the short run to let self-destructive beliefs and behavior go unchecked, but it always makes the problem worse in the long run.
And Elliott Abrams reacts from a more political angle:
I have always found it odd that administration after administration calls this a “final status issue.” At worst for Israel, a return to the 1949 armistice lines would leave Israel in full control of west Jerusalem, where its government institutions are located: the Knesset, courts, ministries, and prime minister’s office. Whatever the disposition or division of the Old City, the Palestinian claim does not involve west Jerusalem. It is therefore bizarre that we refuse to acknowledge Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, even if we feel obliged to say that the final borders of the city remain to be negotiated or that parts of the city are also claimed by Palestinians for the capital of an eventual Palestinian state.
• The problem with AP reports like this is that they’re based on anonymous sources, and the Israeli government has no choice but to deny the allegations. In the interests of transparency, AP should at least shed light on why the CIA’s former Tel Aviv station chief is raising the issue now.
US Sees Israel, Tight Mideast Ally, As Spy Threat
• Robert Fisk has some harsh words for Europe’s supporters of the Palestinians. Shout it from the rooftops:
Then, of course, there’s us, our dear liberal selves who are so quick to fill the streets of London in protest at the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians. Rightly so, of course. When our political leaders are happy to condemn Arabs for their savagery but too timid to utter a word of the mildest criticism when the Israeli army commits crimes against humanity – or watches its allies do it in Lebanon – ordinary people have to remind the world that they are not as timid as the politicians.
But when the scorecard of death in Syria reaches 15,000 or 19,000 – perhaps 14 times as many fatalities as in Israel’s savage 2008-2009 onslaught on Gaza – scarcely a single protester, save for Syrian expatriates abroad, walks the streets to condemn these crimes against humanity. Israel’s crimes have not been on this scale since 1948. Rightly or wrongly, the message that goes out is simple: we demand justice and the right to life for Arabs if they are butchered by the West and its Israeli allies; but not when they are being butchered by their fellow Arabs.
• FYI, the PA’s Arafat inquiry bumbles on.
Iranian Atomic Urgency
• Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s in Israel discussing the Iranian threat with Jerusalem officials. Take your pick of NY Times or Washington Post coverage.
• The Prime Minister’s office denied a Haaretz report (paywall) that US national security advisor Thomas Donilon presented Benjamin Netanyahu with contingency plans for an attack on Iran.
• Columnist Ron Ben-Yishai (YNet) argues that the pace of Iran’s uranium enrichment will make it possible for the mullahs to have a nuclear bomb by the end of 2014.
Arab Spring Winter
• Big media finally gets first-hand confirmation of foreign jihadis in Syria — by two Western journos who were held captive by them for a week. McClatchy News writes:
Jeroen Oerlemans, a Dutch freelance photographer, told the NRC Handelsblatt newspaper that he and British photographer John Cantlie were held for a week by the group, which they accidentally encountered after they’d crossed into Syria surreptitiously from Turkey.
Oerlemans said the group of about 20 included a Pakistani who spoke English and “a number of Africans” and “many Central Asians.” He described them as “foreign jihadists.” . . .
In the days they were held, Oerlemans said, they met other foreign combatants. “We met many combatants who spoke good English, some with Birmingham accents,” he said, referring to the British city that has a large immigrant population. “They see Syria as the last battlefield. But first Assad must be toppled. So they fight against the same opponent as the Free Syrian Army, only with a different purpose. As soon as Assad has fallen, these fighters want to introduce Islamic law, Sharia, in Syria.”
• The CIA’s catch-up on who the Syrian rebels are is also turning up more info about Islamists among the rebels. Don’t expect a secular Sunni state to emerge the day after Bashar Assad is toppled, writes YNet columnist Alex Fishman:
One of the products of CIA collection efforts is a problematic opinion about the rebels. Firstly, says the spy agency, the number of rebels is smaller than what is perceived in the West. Secondly, the rebel leadership was massively infiltrated by radical Muslim Brotherhood elements. Some of the rebels have a radical agenda, both politically and religiously, which is incommensurate with what someone in the White House thinks . . .
And so, while the White House is trying to cultivate a group of states that would endorse the new Syria, CIA officials warn: Not only will there be no new, modern Syria, there is a chance it will be a very old Syria, similar to the current Egyptian model or to the Iraqi model, where nobody knows who controls what. The states who offer financial and military support to the rebels have no idea who they’re supporting.
Today’s NY Times made a similar discovery. It seems the CIA, NYT and the rest of the Big Media are figuring out what the Russians knew all along.
• Documents obtained by the Washington Post show how Syria — with Iranian help — managed to expand its chemical weapons program.
As recently as 2010, documents show that the European Union provided $14.6 million in technical assistance and equipment, some intended for chemical plants, in a deal with the Syrian Ministry of Industry. Diplomats and arms experts have identified the ministry as a front for the country’s chemical weapons program.
Meanwhile, Syria’s foreign minister visits Iran for “consultations.” LA Times coverage.
• Worth reading: Sharif Nashashibi (The Guardian) examines the dilemmas of the Palestinian position on Bashar Assad.
• Sinai-based jihadis released a video of its June cross-border attack. Reuters/Haaretz has the video and backstory.
Rest O’ the Roundup

Tzipi Livni
• Tzipi Livni makes the most articulate case I’ve seen for labeling Hezbollah as a terror organization. After the EU conferred legitimacy on Hezbollah because it is a political party, Livni writes in the Times of London (paywall):
Democracy is not merely a technical matter of elections; it is a set of values. Anyone who rejects these values cannot be allowed to exploit the democratic method for his own gain. The basic starting point of democracy is the rule of law — and the state retaining the exclusive monopoly on the legitimate use of weapons. Hezbollah is a militia armed by Iran and Syria. No democracy could reasonably define an armed militia as a political party.
Europe has learnt to protect itself by having in place constitutional rules that mean only groups that accept democratic values and reject violence can have a role in governing. This is true in Spain, which bans parties from standing in elections because of their support of violence. It is also true for Israel, which has disqualified a far Right racist party from fighting elections. Sinn Fein had to repudiate violence before it could enter power. The same should be demanded of everyone. What applies in Europe must also apply to the turbulent region in which Israelis live. Otherwise this violence will become, as we have witnessed before, the lot of the entire world.
The desire of terror groups to wield political influence can be channelled to moderate them. But moderation will come only if the international community forces them to choose between violence and legitimate power.
• Hezbollah released a video of its 2006 kidnapping of Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev. But why now? The Independent sums up my thinking:
Analysts in Israel and Lebanon suggested the timing of the video release had less to do with heightened tensions between the Shia Muslim guerilla group and Israel, than with the overshadowing of Lebanese domestic politics by the Syrian civil war. Hezbollah has come under increasing pressure ahead of Lebanese elections scheduled for next summer from anti-Syria politicians denouncing the group’s broad support for – and partial dependence on – the Syrian regime during its violent suppression of the 16 month uprising.
• Judge for yourself: The Atlantic talked to State Dept. officials about Israel’s exclusion from U.S.-sponsored Global Counter-Terrorism Forum.
• A staff-ed in The Economist weighs in on the haredi/army controvery. Without commenting on the ruckus myself, I have to say that only a British newspaper would support it for this reason:
Once the haredim have to shoulder their fair share of the burden of continued conflict, their enthusiasm for peace might grow: which would be a further benefit for their countrymen, and the region.
• The news industry’s traditional financial model was for advertising to effectively subsidize news. But with advertising revenue down and new technology forcing Big Media to develop a new financial model, it was just a matter of time till we saw headlines like these (via Romenesko)
- The New York Times is Supported by Readers, Not Advertisers
- Financial Times digital subscriptions surpass print circulation globally
(Image of Livni via YouTube/worldjewishcongress)
For more, see the previous Israel Daily News Stream.
Clicking “Unsubscribe instantly” on your mailing will remove you from the Israel Daily News Stream list, but not from your regular HonestReporting emails.

Dany
9:03 pm
Jul 30, 2012
(w)Rogge was wrong and we missed the proper
moment, alas, I am in tears for my countrymen
40 years, these ELEVEN, a month for the FIVE,
Fewer years for THE CHABAD COUPLE, more
years for countless bus blow outs, twenty some
years for PASSOVER VICTIMS, and so-on,
and so-on, and so-on…. And the uninformed
world sides with the wrong side!?!?!?!
Where did we go wrong? Should we have
behaved like the dispicable murderous terrorist
Arabs? S W H (Should we have) blown a few
Planes all over Europe, S W H indiscrimately
killed kids and elderly? S W H sent killers to
to execute babies in their sleep? S W H ?
No, we will never stoop so low, shame on you
biased media, shame on you antisemites,
shame, shame, shame!!!!!!!
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
19
0
SM ISAC
10:48 pm
Jul 30, 2012
Yes, yes, yes! to Brian Williams, the man who’s been covering Olympics for years. I am SO GLAD to know (for the first time) where he stands on this issue.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
7
1
Fed up
10:57 pm
Jul 30, 2012
The song that comes to mind which sums up the leadership of the world currently is “Send in the Clowns”. The US state dept and the President himself doesn’t know anything about Israel’s geography, and they can’t say what the capital is. The Guardian has moved the capital to Tel Aviv!! The Olympic leadership is so afraid of Muslims they’ve totally lost the vision of what the Olympics is. The Muslim teams won’t practice on the same mats as the Israelis- how ridiculous is that? A bunch of clowns – all of them. Hopefully Romney will replace the clown in chief and bring back some dignity to the US, but if not, next year will also bring us more clowns and fools.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
10
1
Steve Edelman
11:23 pm
Jul 30, 2012
I have been an advocate of the U.S. Olympic Team for many years and have donated to this
years team to get them to London.
The IOOC has been to quiet in regards to the Arabs not wanting to participate against the Israelis
and making every effort to disrupt the Games…..The Arabs are not forced to compete and can take their sorry asses home before they get them ripped by the Israelis and every other nation that they
compete against.
The Munich Olympics with the destruction of the Israeli Team by Palestinian Terrorists, should
be remembered at every Olympics and if the Palestinians are embarrassed by it, TOO BAD.
Their price to pay is very cheap considering the lives they took.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
15
0
Stephen
8:59 am
Jul 31, 2012
The Israeli team missed a magnificent occasion both to remember the fallen 11 and to embarrass the IOC president and the IOC. As the team passed the IOC review stand, 11 black wreaths should have been placed on the ground.
It would have been a reminder, seen by the world, and for those who didn’t know, the international press would have to explain the why and wherefore.
The IOC wouldn’t upset its 50 Muslim members with a minute of silence, Israel would not have done anything that the IOC could complain about (but will and so what), and the point will be driven home.
In the 40 years since the murders at the Olympics, every summer and winter game should have had one minute of silence.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree:
6
0
Big Media Confirms Foreign Jihadis Among Syrian Rebels | Blogs about Israel aggregation
9:26 am
Jul 31, 2012
[...] 3. Big Media finally confirms that foreign jihadis are present in Syria, while the CIA is slowly realizing that Islamic extremists are a bigger part of the rebel leadership than previously realized. More on that below. [...]
Agree or Disagree:
3
0
Voting « One Tired Ema
12:24 pm
Jul 31, 2012
[...] am not impressed that the White House press secretary, Jay Carney, refused to identify Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. You know, it probably would make some governments unhappy. But guess what? Israel’s mere [...]
Agree or Disagree:
0
0
Egypt Responds to Gaza Terror With a Vengeance | Blogs about Israel aggregation
6:13 pm
Aug 07, 2012
[...] White House correspondent Connie Lawn explains the story behind Jay Carney’s Jerusalem capital dodge. She’s rather surprised the video went [...]
Agree or Disagree:
0
0