New York Times Gets Hysterical Over Netanyahu

NYT-magGlass-01

NYT-magGlass-01It must be easy for the editorial board of the New York Times viewing the world from the New York Times Building in Manhattan. The view from Jerusalem is quite different, especially when considering the prospect of an Iranian nuclear bomb.

In a staff editorial on Iran, the NY Times gives the paper’s official view,  hauling anyone over the coals who might stand in the way of a deal with the Iranians as if reaching a deal is more important than the contents of that deal. And the NY Times reserves special opprobrium for Israel’s prime minister:

Unfortunately, the inconclusive negotiations have given an opening to the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who excoriated the proposed agreement as the “deal of the century” for Iran before it is made public, to generate more hysterical opposition.

News breaks fast. Get HonestReporting alerts by e-mail
and never miss a thing.

Free Sign Up

Netanyahu has pointedly not opposed negotiations with Iran. But he is entitled to express his legitimate concern and to oppose any deal that may leave the threat of a nuclear Iran hanging over Israel like a proverbial sword of Damocles.

But why does the NY Times believe that Netanyahu is responsible for generating “hysterical opposition?” The term would imply some sort of irrational behavior and perhaps is indicative of the NY Times’ general disdain for the Israeli prime minister.

Even Time Magazine, also not known for its favorable treatment of Netanyahu, acknowledges “even if Netanyahu has worn out his welcome, some of the West’s leading experts on nuclear proliferation are making much the same case,” before quoting Olli Heinonen, a former deputy director of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency, now at Harvard, and David Albright, an American former IAEA inspector, who runs the Institute for Science and International Security, the Washington think tank that does the most-quoted independent research on Iran’s nuclear program.

Does the NY Times also believe that two former IAEA inspectors are also “hysterical?” Or is the only hysteria on show the NY Times’ apparent desperation see an Iranian deal signed at almost any cost?

This latest shot at Netanyahu is part of an identifiable trend on the part of the NY Times, which, as Israeli commentator Avi Issacharoff wrote, “seems to be directing a campaign against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” while Dror Eydar points out that “The Times has a long history of supporting even the faintest of hopes when it comes to reconciliation with ruthless dictators.”

You can send your considered comments to the New York Times - letters@nytimes.com


Like what you just read? Sign up to get more:


  

Authors
Top
More in (1 of 440 articles)
free-speech-770x400


The saga of the Professor who wrote that pro-Israel students were "brain dead" continues in Illinois and on the pages ...