Who Needs Peace Talks When You Have the Boston Globe?

January 30, 2011 16:52 by

As the Palestinians seek a UN Security Council condemnation of settlement activity, a Boston Globe staff-ed thinks the US should leverage its veto power with Israel:

Obama should use the threat of a Security Council resolution on settlements to push Netanyahu to do what he has said Israel must do: preserve the democratic and Jewish character of the country by bringing into being a Palestinian state alongside Israel. To move the parties from endless haggling to a conclusive peace accord, Obama must be prepared to come forth with fair but firm US solutions for the key issues dividing the two sides.

The Globe, unfortunately, gives a pass to Mahmoud Abbas’s Do-Nothing strategy, while overlooking PaliLeaks’s biggest lesson: the PA’s failure to educate its people about living with Israel is a far bigger obstacle to peace than settlements will ever be.

Category: Backspin Tags:, , , , , ,
1 Comment

You may also like:

  1. Three Strikes Against the Boston Globe
  2. Boston Globe headlines
  3. Boston Globe’s Unusual Correction
  4. Boston Globe’s Jeff Jacoby
  5. Boston Globe’s Jacoby on media bias

One Comment → “Who Needs Peace Talks When You Have the Boston Globe?”

  1. [...] HonestReporting Media BackSpin, 30. Januar 2011 [...]

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
Show poorly rated comments

Leave a Reply

More in Backspin (701 of 5885 articles)


Did social media bring down Tunisian dictator Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali two weeks ago or force Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak ...

View in: Mobile | Standard