fbpx

With your support we continue to ensure media accuracy

Media Continues to Fan the Flames of Progressive ‘Squad’ Antisemitism

Is it acceptable for a progressive Democrat to say and do antisemitic things and then deny they are antisemitic during their election campaigns by latching onto fringe groups like If Not Now and Jewish Voices…

Reading time: 5 minutes

Is it acceptable for a progressive Democrat to say and do antisemitic things and then deny they are antisemitic during their election campaigns by latching onto fringe groups like If Not Now and Jewish Voices for Peace?

This seems to be the case with Representative Cori Bush (D-MO).

The mainstream media is once again beginning to shift the focus from domestic issues to Israel and the Jewish community for the upcoming August St. Louis Democratic primary race between Bush and St. Louis County Prosecutor Wesley Bell.

The race follows in the footsteps of last month’s New York Democratic primary between Jamaal Bowman and George Latimer, in which the media placed a heavy focus on Israel and “big money,” when voters were mostly concerned with domestic issues. The Jewish community felt unsafe and disturbed by Bowman’s apparent antisemitism. In the end, he lost the race, and was unseated by Latimer.

Related Reading: ‘The Squad’ and Media Cronies Are So Obsessed with Israel, & It’s Antisemitic

However this lesson has apparently not been learned by both Bush and the media. Most American voters prioritize on domestic issues at the ballot box.

As a matter of fact, Emerson College Polling, The Hill, and Nexstar Missouri conducted a poll which revealed that Missouri voters prioritize the economy (34.3%), abortion access (12.3%) and immigration (10.3%) as top three issues. Israel-Hamas did not even fall within the nine categories recorded in the poll.

The Media

Since Bowman’s June loss, Bush has played it safe on her social media. That is, until Tuesday.

Immediately after the Israel-Hamas war started on October 7, Bush and other congresspeople voted against a resolution which supported Israel and condemned Hamas. Prior, she called for the United States to end aid to Israel.

It is important to note that Bush has not been well-liked by the St. Jewish community. Her comments have most recently come to light after October 7. One of the most vivid examples is her tweet via her congressional X (formerly Twitter) account on October 30:


In November, the Jewish community of St. Louis put out a joint-statement condemning Bush’s comments regarding Israel attempting to ethnically cleanse Palestinians in Gaza in response:

To accuse Israel of ethnic cleansing as it seeks to defend itself and locate hundreds of hostages still held captive in Gaza — taken only because they were assumed to be Jews — is sickening… Her statement not only fails to advance peace, but it incites anger and the potential of further violence toward the Jewish community.

Bush also has a history of being associated with people like rabid antisemites and BDS activists Naveen Ayesh and Linda Sarsour.

Ayesh has been caught and exposed by both Canary Mission and then Congress of supporting terror groups like the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. She also hosted more than one fundraising event for Bush over the years.

In an interview with NPR’s Jason Rosenbaum on Monday, headlined “Bush says her Gaza cease-fire push is resonating with Missouri’s 1st District voters,” about half (and the first half no less) of the live show discussion was about Bush’s Israel-Gaza position. The article prioritizes the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Jewish voters ahead of all other policies and issues.

After expressing frustration at opponent Bell’s backing from pro-Israel groups despite not running his campaign around Israel, Rosenbaum even responded that it was because black voters in their district “don’t vote based on Israel.” 

So why then, is more than half this interview about Israel? Why is NPR, along with The National Desk and others, starting to push this narrative again, if it’s irrelevant to the race?

A focus on Bush’s Israel stance, along with her slams on pro-Israel “republican mega-money,” may sound juicy, but it can be seen as despicable.

The National Desk article already brings in Bowman by the third paragraph, as it introduces the Israel-Hamas War and Trump “mega-donors” to the piece. This, just to insert Bush’s reaction to his loss, blaming “extremists” and claiming that groups like AIPAC tried to “buy votes.”

No other issues were mentioned in the entire article.

Media attempts to absolve Bush of previous libelous accusations of Israel carrying out an ethnic cleansing among others is manipulative, while she continues to insist in interviews that her actions and statements promote safety for both Israelis and Palestinians. She has various tweets which say otherwise.

As the media continues to perpetuate this narrative of Israel being the main issue, here is our message: Don’t fan the flames of antisemitism, especially during a wave of rising antisemitic attacks.

Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.

Red Alert
Send us your tips
By clicking the submit button, I grant permission for changes to and editing of the text, links or other information I have provided. I recognize that I have no copyright claims related to the information I have provided.
Skip to content