Who gets to decide whether Jerusalem is Israel’s capital city?
The Guardian fails to mention why Israel enforces a maritime exclusion zone off the coast of Gaza.
Is the dispute over the Palestinian village of Susiya a simple human rights issue or has the rule of law been ignored by the media and Israel’s critics?
The Guardian downplays a Palestinian detainee’s involvement in terrorism, portraying him as an innocent journalist persecuted by Israel.
The Guardian deliberately edits relevant sections questioning Jewish responsibility for an alleged arson attack from an AFP copy.
Palestinians have been killed while carrying out terrorism or confronting Israeli security forces. So why then does The Guardian refer to Israeli self-defense as “deadly retaliation?”
In The Guardian, author David Rieff argues that “Israel offers a florid illustration of how disastrously collective memory can deform a society.”
The Guardian refers to right-wing Israeli group Im Tirtzu as “extra-paramilitary.” Was this subconscious bias at work?
The Guardian’s sub-header states as fact, an allegation that a Palestinian woman was raped and tortured by the Israeli military after carrying out a terrorist bombing in 1969.
More Palestinian terror attacks mean more screwy headlines. Context and accuracy took a hit. Without question, today’s worst headline was served up by the Irish Times. For readers who initially wrote us about this screwy Associated Press header (cached version), the wire service subsequently updated the headline. Most papers around the world updated their AP wire…